The Maglev Mirage | 78 comments (73 topical, 5 editorial, 0 hidden)

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 1)

I've never liked the Maglev idea either. ICE and TGV are several times cheaper and almost as fast (320 km/h (with a potential of 350 km/h) versus 430 km/h). I'd much rather have 500 km TGV/ICE than 50 km (or whatever) Maglev.

We have a dormant TGV/ICE project in Sweden called The European Corridor. The old corrupt government never pushed it, but maybe the new one will.

I really hope it will.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid on Tue Sep 26th, 2006 at 11:43:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

Are you saying you expect the new right-wing government to be less corrupt than the old left-wing one? What are you basing this on?

by Trond Ove on Tue Sep 26th, 2006 at 12:17:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

Also: a right-wing government (one advocating a more liberal economic policy to boot) more firendly to investment into public transport?

_{*Lunatic*, n.

One whose delusions are out of fashion.}

by DoDo on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:32:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

Contracts for their friends and family in industry.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:34:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

They are also a lot more pro-industry and would love to spend public money to improve the competitivness of Swedish industry, especially if it would create new jobs, as they were elected mainly on a jobs platform.

Furthermore, the main rightwing party has been very opposed to having free market road tolls in the capital. I am holding my fingers crossed. :)

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:43:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 1)

Right. Or maybe, being more pro-industry, they will go on a new privatization spree making things worse not better. Or the kind of semi-privatization schemes that is providing (or increasing?) state funding for private schools to provide more 'choice', or similar in the healthcare industry. I have heard both of those things suggested at some point.
By free market road tolls in the capital, do you mean the congestion tax? How is this a free market road toll? It seems like a measure to promote use of public transport and decrease traffic in the city. Popular with those who actually live in the city, less so to the suburbians. I don't see how the congestion tax is anything but a good thing.

by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 06:17:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 1)

The Swedish (heavy) industry has been burned by power deregulation and recoils from anything that sounds like privatization. The new pm has argued against Cevian assaulting Volvo etc. Industrial capitalism is making a comeback against financial capitalism.

Schools and hospital privatization is not anything to worry about as it will still be tax-payed. If the private schools (which anyone can be admitted to free of charge) do better that the public schools it's a good thing and if they don't they'll close. It's a win-win situation.

On a tangent, the pm has his kids in public school in spite of a majority of schools in his hometown being private.

-----------------------------------------------------
The congestion tax is a neoliberal idea, which is why Federley and the neolibs support it. The argument is that roads are a good like any other and the price of using it should be decided by supply and demand. That is, if there is a large demand on roads and a small supply (=congestion) there should be a cost so the poor stays away from driving so the rich can have a nicer driving experience.

What if we did like this in the hospital emergency room or in public transport?

- Sorry we just have had a large car accident so we can't take care of your gunshot wound right now. But you can cut the line if you pay €1000.

- Because of the congestion in the subway we have decided to increase fare prices to €10 so supply meets demand without inefficient congestion. Have a nice day.

Those are absurd solutions. If there is a congestion for a vital good the solution is not to increase prices but increase capacity. That is build a new hospital, or in the matter of congestion, build new highways, railroads and metros.

Arguing that prices should be allowed to increase to spur new investment (in hospitals or roads etc) is irrelevant as those things are not operating on a free market so it won't work, and more importantly, I do not want to live in a society where the price of those things are decided by the market. Call me a commie bastard if you like. ;)

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 07:05:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 1)

I remain suspicious of this alliance. I can't help but fear that for all their pretty talk the Moderate party is really just doing the best they can to make sure that as much money goes to the wealthiest segment of society as they can get away with. The alliance did push the traditional "welfare recipients are a bunch of lazy cheats and lowering payments will lead to more people with work" before the election.
---
Roads are not like a hospital emergency room. There are alternatives, like public transport. I don't think increasing road capacity is really a solution for traffic congestion in major cities. There is only so much space to go around. Where are you going to put all those new roads? Roads are not a vital good when you have a public transport system! More roads also typically yields more traffic rather than improving congestion. So more polluting vehicles in city centres, which the inhabitants of the same with some right disfavour. If one believes (as I do) that dense urban areas are preferable to suburban sprawl with long commuting distances, cars ought to be kept out of the cities so they remain a reasonable place to live.

by someone (s0me1smail(a)gmail(d)com) on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 08:47:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 1)

Re: The argument is that roads are a good like any other and the price of using it should be decided by supply and demand.

Supply and demand are in balance anyway, with the total price (including non-monetary) including the inconvenience, additional fuel consumption, etc., caused by the congestion. I think that the argument is better staged in terms of differing negative externalities of driving at different times, noting that differential monetary pricing is a non-destructive transfer of tokens, while congestion destroys actual fuel and slices of human lifetime.

It is often argued that X should have a lower price because the poor will be more affected, but this applies with similar force to all non-luxury goods X. In all instances, to act on this would distort prices and incentives. This suggests that it is far better to address inequalities more directly, on the income side.

Words and ideas I offer here may be used freely and without attribution.

by technopolitical on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 06:40:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

I hope so. The leftists showed they are corrupt. The new government haven't had the chance to be corrupt yet.

Also this new government is composed of four parties instead of one which means the pm will not be a president anymore. This means there will be several competing centres of power withinh the government. This will give some checks and balances that should stop the worst excesses.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:43:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

I may agree with the analysis here but I have to note that all breaktrhough/disruptive technologies are less efficient than already mature ones.

You need dedicated "starry eyed" early adopters to make the economics work. And Maglev has significant potential advantages by the reduced friction especially if combined with wings in ground effect tunnels.

Orthodoxy is not a religion.

by BalkanIdentity (balkanid _ at _ google.com) on Tue Sep 26th, 2006 at 12:44:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

You need dedicated "starry eyed" early adopters to make the economics work.

But often even that is not enough. Some concepts just don't work economically. In that case, the starry-eyed waste money, often public money, which is really bad if it could have been spent on something else less impressive but still modern and sensible. A modern high-speed train, or a suburban train locomotive with the latest permanent-magnet synchronous motors under its hood, or a track-changing tramway, or a linear motor subway might cause less starry eyes, but they are no less modern and make much more sense.

_{*Lunatic*, n.

One whose delusions are out of fashion.}

by DoDo on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:37:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

And Maglev has significant potential advantages by the reduced friction

Actually, while mechanical friction is reduced, a larger magnetic friction takes its stead.

_{*Lunatic*, n.

One whose delusions are out of fashion.}

by DoDo on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 06:11:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

Do you really expect anything but big corruption scandals when the new government sells at a very low price state assets to their friends?

by Laurent GUERBY on Tue Sep 26th, 2006 at 01:46:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

For fairness, note that 430 km/h reached on 40 km and 350 km/h reached on 200 km is comparing apples and oranges. Maglev could easily reach speeds above 500 km/h over longer distances, while a top speed of at most 250 km/h is realistic for normal rail airport shuttles over such short distances [though 350 is technically possible].

_{*Lunatic*, n.

One whose delusions are out of fashion.}

by DoDo on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:30:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 1)

Of course, it really shines when considering intercontinental routes in evacuated tubes. Maglev systems can then beat supersonic jets by a wide margin.

But (as usual), this is out of reach because of cost, which is to say the cost of things, which is to say, in large measure, the cost of making things. We're still very bad at that.

Words and ideas I offer here may be used freely and without attribution.

by technopolitical on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 06:43:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Maglev Mirage (none / 0)

Of course, it really shines when considering intercontinental routes in evacuated tubes. Maglev systems can then beat supersonic jets by a wide margin.

Could you bring more on that? I have the faint memory of there being some upper limit to maglev speed, which is under that of pneumatic tube railway, but maybe it was only due to air drag.

_{*Lunatic*, n.

One whose delusions are out of fashion.}

by DoDo on Thu Sep 28th, 2006 at 03:55:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

The Maglev Mirage | 78 comments (73 topical, 5 editorial, 0 hidden)

Top Diaries

Energy (and Other) Events Monthly - December 2023

by gmoke - Nov 28

Clean Energy Wire's Fact Sheet on Upcoming Dutch Election

by gmoke - Nov 12
7 comments

Top Diaries

Energy (and Other) Events Monthly - December 2023

Clean Energy Wire's Fact Sheet on Upcoming Dutch Election

Recent Diaries

Netanyahu Tells Biden Fu*k Off

Keeping Up with COP28

A Sort-a Truce Extended 24 Hours

Energy (and Other) Events Monthly - December 2023

NeXiT the Trump Era of Dutch PM Wilders

Erasure of Palestinians the Zionist Dream

21st Century Pax Americana and Violence

Dublin Far Right Riots After Knife Attack

Clean Break From Peace to War

Woodrow Wilson's Collapse and the Peace Movement

A Children's Sing-Along Annihilate Everyone In Gaza

Xi - Joe Launch a New Communication Probe

The Israeli War Hoax of 40 Beheaded Babies

If Palestinians Are 'Animals'? What Are the Israelis?

Gaza Atrocities and the UN Fail

Clean Energy Wire's Fact Sheet on Upcoming Dutch Election

Broadening the War to Lebanon and Syria-Iraq

Dishonest Hope and Trust In a Two-State Option

Gaza Massacre, Biden Funding Ethnic Cleansing

Dominique de Villepin Israel's Security Not by War

Occasional Series