Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
IIRC, the Scottish parliamentary seats are distributed (roughly) proportionally to votes. Correct?

Since this very seldom produces a majority party, different (formal and informal) rules generally rule the formation of a government. In some cases (like Sweden) minority governments are common and in some others (like Germany) they are very uncommon, if they exist at all. From what you have written it would look like it in Scotland would demand a majority for forming a government. True?

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Thu Jan 18th, 2007 at 08:00:25 AM EST
The Scottish Parliament uses an Additional Member electoral system, similar to that used in Germany. This ensures a quite proportional result and has produced a multi-party politics far more like that of Sweden than that of the majoritarian Westminster tradition.

It is fair to say that there is no realistic possibility of a single party winning a majority in the Scottish Parliament. Up to now a Labour-Liberal Democrat majority coalition has ruled in Edinburgh. It is uncertain what would happen if that coalition lost its majority.

The First Minister of Scotland is elected by the Scottish Parliament. I am not sure if he needs an absolute majority or if a majority of those members voting is sufficient. There does not seem to be any reason why there should not be a minority coalition, once a First Minister has been elected.

The current Parliament elected in 2003 (and the first Parliament elected in 1999) comprise:-

Labour 50 (56), Scottish National Party 26* (35), Conservative 17 (18), Liberal Democrats 17 (17*), Scottish Green Party 7 (1), Scottish Socialist Party 6 (1) of which 2 have since formed a party called Solidarity, Scottish Senior Citizens Unity Party 1 (0), Independent 5 (1). The party total marked * includes the Presiding Officer, who ceases to be regarded as a party member whilst serving as Presiding Officer.

It will be seen that the three largest parties all lost a seat or seats in the second election, as the voters realised that parties with no hope in first past the post elections could win seats in a proportional representation election.

by Gary J on Thu Jan 18th, 2007 at 01:09:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Looking at the Scotland Act 1998, the Scottish Parliament nominates a member to be appointed First Minister by the Queen. The act does not state how much support is needed to be nominated. In every case so far the First Minister nominee has been supported by more than half the members.
by Gary J on Thu Jan 18th, 2007 at 01:31:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suppose if the Act says nothing else "nomination" is a regular motion of the Scottish parliament, so only a plurality of votes cast is needed to carry it?

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jan 18th, 2007 at 01:34:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"I suppose if the Act says nothing else "nomination" is a regular motion of the Scottish parliament, so only a plurality of votes cast is needed to carry it?"

I agree that is the obvious interpretation. I think if an absolute majority of all members was required it would have been specified in the legislation.

by Gary J on Thu Jan 18th, 2007 at 01:39:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series