The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
This is all very speculative, but, notwithstanding the intense rivalry between Iran and Arab nations, I see it as unlikely that a US nuclear attack on Iran would not have major geopolitical repercussions with other nuclear powers.
In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
Sane people try to avoid using nukes, by definition, especially in a first strike. Even with exceptional provocation, it's impossible not to consider first use a war crime.
In Bush's case it's just one more to add to the list. And this most supine of so-called Democratic Congresses will very likely stand idly by.
A nuke attack on US soil would be a godsend for Bush. Suddenly it's a real war, which means he gets to suspend the constitution, and the rest.
There's no real down side for him. At worse he gets to blow some shit up. At best he gets to be Dictator in Chief.
Unless someone from the Pentagon marches into the Oval Office with a gun and drags him out, he has nothing to lose and a whole lot to gain.
Ah, there might be hope if there actually was an opposition party in the US.
Alas, there isn't.
The Hun is always either at your throat or at your feet.
When Congress was controlled by the Republicans Bush got to do everything he wanted as soon as he wanted. Now that Democrats have the majority they will fret and talk and quibble and then let Bush do what he wants.
The difference is crucial.
She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
Also, while they are a nuclear power, they only have an estimated 30-80 warheads. I don't think that is sufficient overkill capacity to let them divert a warhead targeted at, say, Mumbai to park in a U-Store in Long Beach.
The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
And how much do you want to bet that Pakistan has not already smuggled a few bombs in a warehouse in NY Harbor or Long Beach?
Rather a lot, actually. Unless intended for pretty much immediate use, I would tend to think that such bombs would be more risk than it's worth, due to the risk of them being found. If they are found, the political fallout - you should pardon the expression - will be profound. Thus, if they are to be used as an effective deterrent, the Pakistani government would have to count on them remaining undetected indefinitely. I don't believe that's realistic. Of course, it's possible that the Pakistani government disagrees with some aspect of my assessment...
As for the risk that they might be able to smuggle nukes into the US after the commencement of hostilities, OTOH... Well, unless the US wants to shut off all container-ship imports from the general part of the world, I don't see how it could be prevented.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 8 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 10 18 comments
by Oui - Jul 12 2 comments
by Oui - Jul 7 20 comments
by gmoke - Jul 8
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 3 28 comments
by eurogreen - Jun 28 24 comments
by gmoke - Jun 28
by Bernard - Jul 15
by Oui - Jul 122 comments
by Oui - Jul 1122 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 1018 comments
by gmoke - Jul 8
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 823 comments
by Oui - Jul 720 comments
by Oui - Jul 7
by Oui - Jul 512 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 328 comments
by gmoke - Jun 29
by eurogreen - Jun 2824 comments
by gmoke - Jun 28
by Oui - Jun 2719 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 271 comment
by Oui - Jun 2519 comments
by Oui - Jun 1784 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1610 comments
by Oui - Jun 158 comments
by Oui - Jun 1213 comments