London - Dying like a Dinosaur | 65 comments (65 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Re: London - Dying like a Dinosaur (none / 1)

So, on that the whole Midlands is basically inside an hour. I reckon if its point to point ... eg, Luton, Northhampton, Birmingham, Stoke-on-Trent, Manchester ... that goes beyond an hour end to end, but would still retain a network city effect.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Thu Nov 1st, 2007 at 08:22:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: London - Dying like a Dinosaur (4.00 / 2)

I also calculated your proposed indicator of suitability of HSR links (namely, geometric mean population divided by distance) for the UK's 10 largest conurbations by population (wikipedia). Here's the result:

         from         to     score miles

90 Manchester      Leeds 41654.487  44.0

88 Manchester  Liverpool 38969.011  34.7

86     London Birmingham 36850.567 118.0

84 Manchester  Sheffield 30957.756  38.7

82 Birmingham Nottingham 23908.977  51.6

80 Birmingham Manchester 23736.151  95.3

78      Leeds  Sheffield 23732.979  41.3

76     London Manchester 20703.905 208.0

74     London Nottingham 18349.031 128.0

72     London    Bristol 18100.438 118.0

70     London      Leeds 17975.517 196.0

68 Birmingham      Leeds 15422.111 120.0

66      Leeds  Liverpool 15259.233  72.5

64 Manchester Nottingham 15065.351  81.1

62 Nottingham  Sheffield 14986.543  43.6

60 Birmingham  Liverpool 13961.131  97.8

58     London  Sheffield 13873.797 166.0

56      Leeds Nottingham 13618.395  73.4

54 Birmingham  Sheffield 13456.476  89.9

52     London  Liverpool 12319.395 211.0

50      Leeds  Newcastle 11661.980  98.5

48 Birmingham    Bristol 11542.302  97.2

46 Manchester  Newcastle  9683.194 145.0                                   

44     London  Newcastle  9605.132 281.0

42  Liverpool  Sheffield  9142.400  79.1

40     London    Glasgow  7716.775 403.0

38 Manchester    Glasgow  7455.181 217.0

36 Birmingham  Newcastle  6848.996 207.0

34    Glasgow  Newcastle  6714.830 151.0

32  Liverpool Nottingham  6584.736 112.0

30 Manchester    Bristol  6277.328 177.0

28      Leeds    Glasgow  6016.128 220.0

26 Birmingham    Glasgow  5632.880 290.0

24  Newcastle  Sheffield  5402.064 139.0

22  Newcastle  Liverpool  4761.271 178.0

20  Newcastle Nottingham  4669.284 164.0

18    Glasgow  Liverpool  4458.924 219.0

16      Leeds    Bristol  4370.254 208.0

14 Nottingham    Bristol  4297.704 141.0

12  Liverpool    Bristol  3725.906 180.0

10    Glasgow  Sheffield  3379.604 256.0

8   Sheffield    Bristol  3301.136 180.0

6     Glasgow Nottingham  3128.789 282.0

4   Newcastle    Bristol  2329.008 299.0

2     Glasgow    Bristol  2162.716 371.0

As was discussed in the US HSR diary, a minimum travel time of 30 minutes corresponds to about 86 miles. A hypothetical Liverpool-Manchester-Leeds train barely has time to reach cruise speed before it has to slow down for the intermediate stop, so the first HSR link that makes sense is London-Birmingham.

We have met the enemy, and it is us — Pogo

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Nov 1st, 2007 at 08:23:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: London - Dying like a Dinosaur (none / 1)

Wow, that place looks like it was build for high speed rail ... is that the same UK that took a bloody ax to its rail system a while back?

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Thu Nov 1st, 2007 at 09:52:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: London - Dying like a Dinosaur (none / 1)

Yes. Sad, isn't it?

Considering the Leeds-Manchester-Liverpool line seems to be a no-brainer and potentially the most sensible of all major rail links in the country, I decided to check nationalrail.co.uk to see what the situation is like at present.

The fastest direct train takes 1h47 minutes, while we know it could take as little as 27 minutes non-stop and less than 40 minutes with a stop in Manchester. At nearly 2h travel time it almost makes sense to fly from Leeds to Liverpool, but a good rail connection via Manchester would such the airlines dry of their market share.

We have met the enemy, and it is us — Pogo

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 at 06:59:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: London - Dying like a Dinosaur (none / 1)

Set aside HSR ... what would it be at modern Express speed? 10 minutes each accel, 10 minutes each de-accel, that's 40 minutes ... for a tilt-train, say for simplicity that its 7 miles each phase.

OK, Leeds, Manchester, 14 miles in 20 minutes, 30 miles at 100mph so about 18 minutes, for a total of 38 minutes.

Manchester, Liverpool, 14 miles in 20 minutes, 21 miles at 100mph, is about 13 minutes, for about 33 minutes.

10 minutes for debarking and embarking at Manchester, and eventually arriving after an HSR London/Birmingham/Manchester arrives and before it returns, would yield 1 hour 21 minutes.

Non-stop Leeds/Liverpool, 14 miles in 20 minutes, 59 miles in 39 minutes, 59 minutes.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 at 01:30:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: London - Dying like a Dinosaur (4.00 / 2)

That is probably what is in place now, except that there are more intermediate stops. 1h21m is not that different from 1h47m, especially if you add additional stops. TransPennine runs Class 185 trains with a top speed of 100mph on all its lines. It could introduce some Class 43 trains for a cruise speed of 125mph (though the top speed is closer to 150mph). That's what passes for "High Speed" in the UK, but it is 25-year old diesel technology.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 at 06:00:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Rail privatization doesn't work (4.00 / 3)

Intercity Express Programme - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The DfT states that their involvement in a future fleet specification and acquisition is necessary for several reasons. Though Britain's rail operators are privatised, their franchises seldom last for more than 12 years; a train, on the other hand, may remain in service for more than 30 years. It is therefore entirely unprofitable for the franchise operator to replace the fleet, leaving the only other option to hire newly acquired trains from third parties, which can prove extremely expensive. The DfT also states that it can, and has, brought train operators together with a `whole system, whole life' perspective to decide on a specification that will be more flexible with regards to future routes and fleet transfers as well as more environmentally aware.

(My emphasis)

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 at 06:03:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: London - Dying like a Dinosaur (4.00 / 4)

It depends on the standard of the local rail network as well, Our local railway route lost its ability to run class 43's in about 1993, runing direct to Birmingham at reasonably high speed. One of the main reasons that it was reported to have happened was so that the train companies could reduce the ammount spent on track maintenance by running lighter trains. one of the side effects of this are frequent patches where we are told that we are running slowly in an area due to track conditions.

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 at 06:16:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Double take (none / 1)

Our local railway route lost its ability to run class 43's in about 1993, ... One of the main reasons that it was reported to have happened was so that the train companies could reduce the [amount] spent on track maintenance by running lighter trains.

Say what?

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 at 06:26:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Double take (4.00 / 2)

All the trains on the line when I last went on it were all These

Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.

by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 at 06:36:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: London - Dying like a Dinosaur (none / 1)

Obviously I don't know the terrain ... it could be, but 1:20 quite definitely is a different mode split to 1:47, as well as at least one more set to run the same number of services.

But it looks like the key there is conventional Non-Stop / Express / Local scheduling with the Non-Stop chasing the Express chasing the Local into Manchester (on either side).

Assuming 125mph and working that through again ...

Leeds, Manchester, 14 miles in 20 minutes, 30 miles at 125mph so about 15 minutes, for a total of 35 minutes.

Manchester, Liverpool, 14 miles in 20 minutes, 21 miles at 125mph, is about 10 minutes, for about 30 minutes.

10 minutes for debarking and embarking at Manchester, and eventually arriving after an HSR London/Birmingham/Manchester arrives and before it returns, would yield 1 hour 1:15 minutes, so not the same improvement as :145 to 1:20.

Non-stop Leeds/Liverpool, 14 miles in 20 minutes, 59 miles in 29 minutes, 49 minutes.

Not surprisingly, the bonus for a slight ratcheting up of the speed of the class 43 is is the Leeds/Liverpool non-stop.

But to me, the linchpin there for the regional transport task is a true HSR line London/Birmingham/Manchester, and Non-Stop / Express / Locals chasing each other into Manchester to connect with the HSR. However, if it is possible to get an effective Dublin connection by ferry from Liverpool, then I can see taking a London/Birmingham/Manchester HSR on into Liverpool.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Nov 2nd, 2007 at 06:56:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

London - Dying like a Dinosaur | 65 comments (65 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Top Diaries

There Ain't Nothing Boris Can't Fix

Time to wield the big stick

N. Ireland Protocol receives democratic mandate

Expelling Russia

Northern Ireland Assembly Elections

Annexation Of Land - Changing Borders

Germany Goes To War

Energy (and Other) Events - May 2022

Recent Diaries

Time to wield the big stick

There Ain't Nothing Boris Can't Fix

NATO War Planning -- In 2021 Ukraine

Shireen Abu Akhleh Killed by Israeli Sniper [Update]

N. Ireland Protocol receives democratic mandate

American Revival of the Barry Goldwater Era

Annexation Of Land - Changing Borders

Expelling Russia

City Agriculture - May 5, 2022

Northern Ireland Assembly Elections

Germany Goes To War

Energy (and Other) Events - May 2022

America Today!

Third and Deciding Phase for Europe

NATO Russia Founding Act - A Dead Letter

Standing Up to Russia

EU Death Trap - Fast Track Ukraine As Member

Mr Franklin's Folks

It Could Happen Here: Chronicle of a (not so) Foretold...

Zelensky A Leader Failed to Rise from the Ashes

Occasional Series