Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
but animals do not act because of... they just act...

Do you mean

--animals have no reasons for their actions

--animals have reasons but as humans we cannot fathom them (except by inaccurate anthropomorphism)

--animals do not rationalise their actions to themselves

--animals may rationalise their actions to themselves, but humans could never know about/comprehend any such rationalisations

or something else?  My experience is that animals have good reasons for their actions; and the more complex the animal and/or environment the more its visible (including humans), so I think I have not understood


Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.

by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Wed Oct 10th, 2007 at 11:16:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series