The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Well informed readers hopefully see this situation in less simplistic and cliched terms.
When you talk about my diary as "simplistic and cliched," do you have something in mind like this:
Well, it is not 1968.
It's the US who started this.
one would hope that the er, uhm, CZECH and POLISH folks would realize how stupid this idea is
This isn't a Hollywood movie. This is foreign policy.
Thanks for providing a little hall of fame of simplistic remarks and cliche's, and for being dense enough to call attention to it by insulting me! (I only posted on European Tribune out of admiration for Jerome, and the rest of it is just a sad joke.)
My comments we not about you, but the situation you write about. "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
Pathetic!
Well-informed readers may wonder why the Russians are painting a picture of the US and Russia on the brink of nuclear war, aligning themselves with Iran, abrogating treaties, and in general making such a fuss about ABM installations, even though virtually every ABM test ends in total failure. "Well informed readers hopefully see this situation in less simplistic and cliched terms."
Well-informed readers may wonder why the Russians are painting a picture of the US and Russia on the brink of nuclear war, aligning themselves with Iran, abrogating treaties, and in general making such a fuss about ABM installations, even though virtually every ABM test ends in total failure.
"Well informed readers hopefully see this situation in less simplistic and cliched terms."
Again, it is not you that I've insulted. It is the unhelpful way this subject is framed everywhere in the media. I'd say your post was much more fair than a lot of coverage. But it is very easy -for anyone- to slip into the old ways of talking about US-Russia relations, relying more on emotive rhetoric than reason and facts. It is a simplistic approach, and I do hope well informed readers can see that. Because, frankly, it is not you Jacob, I'm concerned about. It's what you are writing about. "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
At that time I though maybe a little more credit should be given for stimulating discussion and a little less for rehashing les idées reçues.
This diary is probably destined for the same oblivion, unless something radically improves. (I only posted on European Tribune out of admiration for Jerome, and the rest of it is just a sad joke.)
If you delete another one of your diaries we might be forced to take away your ability to edit your own stories once posted. We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
I suspect there are very few military strategists here and so few would feel qualified to engage with you on your central thesis. We are here to learn, perhaps to add a minor or supplementary comment, not as experts to peer review a scholarly work.
Writing a comment and checking out the reaction to it is the best way of testing out a half formed thought or theory. If we were experts, we probably wouldn't be here in the first place! Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 32 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 3 comments
by gmoke - Aug 25 1 comment
by Oui - Sep 18
by Oui - Sep 1713 comments
by Oui - Sep 154 comments
by Oui - Sep 151 comment
by Oui - Sep 1315 comments
by Oui - Sep 13
by Oui - Sep 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 1010 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 103 comments
by Oui - Sep 10
by Oui - Sep 92 comments
by Oui - Sep 84 comments
by Oui - Sep 715 comments
by Oui - Sep 72 comments
by Oui - Sep 63 comments
by Oui - Sep 54 comments
by gmoke - Sep 5