The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If I understand you, you make the claim that Sarkozy has a chummy relationship with much of the press. I can see that with some right elements of the press, but I would not expect it with other elements of the press.
Or are you arguing that the media's need to keep the horserace going will force them to bring Royal back into the race...not for any other purpose than to satisfy the media's need to keep the public intrigued?
Or am I misreading this?
Otherwise, a very interesting discussion. Thanks.
I've discussed this in diaries (see links Jérôme has usefully added above), especially:
11 in a row for Sarko Roots vs MSM, synthesis? The Republic of Far Far Away
As for the leftwing or centrist press, it has been under more and more pressure from big money. See:
Le Monde, Journal of Record
and a series on Libération (link goes to third part which contains links to first two parts).
To sum up: Sarko can personally pull a lot of levers in the MSM. What remains of a leftwing (or simply neutral) press is small and shaky.
So when the media tell stories, they tend to serve Sarkozy, or at least not to hurt Sarkozy. And I did find the change in storyline intriguing three weeks ago, when the media stopped running with the "Ségolène is falling out of the sky" narrative. The Canard Enchaîné at the time reported that the Sarko campaign were worried she might really disappear.
I see that the Arrêt sur images I missed yesterday was about the polls and how reliable they are. Seems to be occurring to rather a lot of people.
Is this type of politics new? Clearly its the same thing for bush, but to me it is just a modern expression of traditional politics, maybe at the extreme.
They also mentioned that the press is afraid of Sarko's mean attitude, and expect to get the short end of a stick if he were to be elected, for saying things against him (like bringing up the land scandal.)
For a quick piece, it was a surprisingly 'balanced', if not even informative view of the many sides of Sarkozy. Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.
Frank Delaney ~ Ireland
by gmoke - Nov 28
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by gmoke - Nov 30
by Oui - Nov 3010 comments
by Oui - Nov 2837 comments
by Oui - Nov 278 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments
by Oui - Nov 10
by Oui - Nov 928 comments
by Oui - Nov 8
by Oui - Nov 73 comments