The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
It did cover half of it. So, by "external policies in world affairs", did you meant only global policies? Why the restriction -- do you want to fight the accusation that all the world's conflicts in the last 217 years were the fault of the USA, which is not how I read the diary; or do you want to prove that most of the time the USA was a lesser meddler in foreign affairs than the Eurasian imperial powers?
With reason, given that Haiti had to pay compensation to France for its independence and end of slavery -- they were forced to do so after warships of the USA imposed a trade blockade on the island. But they can also balem US occupiers, just during the Banana Wars, who presided over the de-facto reintroduction of slave labor ("corvée labor").
Are you seriously blaming the rise of totalitarianism on US isolationism? Given that the latter grew out from WWI and the the foul peace afterwards, during which Wilson sided with one set of European imperialists and then failed to stop them from imposing a victors' peace (not to mention the ethnic-hate consequences of what was applied of the Wilson Doctrine), I'm not as certain as you that the USA could have acted successfully as a global policeman, even if its leaders wanted that. Also, do you know that before WWII broke out, there were plenty of Hitler symphatisants in the US, including in the elite?
You are right we would probably not been able to be the policeman of the world, but isolationism is something that did not help the world or the US either.
Yes, I read the hate grandpa Bush's sites.
For the Western part, the EU and its predecessors. The longest before, the pre-WWI Belle Epoque. For all of Europe, I'm not sure there was ever a multi-decade one. Why do you ask?
Why restrict comparisons to those? But yes, I am willing, especially if we talk about the broader hundred-year Banana Wars, including genocidal slaughter in Guatemala and elsewhere. Colonial interests were involved in both.
What should I defend about it? As someone who wrote seven long diaries on the subject here on ET, I am particularly curious how exactly you think it is doubly relevant here.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 15 48 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 13 37 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 12 22 comments
by Oui - Sep 16
by Bernard - Sep 10 12 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 9 25 comments
by Oui - Sep 14 3 comments
by Oui - Sep 16
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1548 comments
by Oui - Sep 143 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1337 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1222 comments
by Cat - Sep 1126 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 119 comments
by Bernard - Sep 1012 comments
by Oui - Sep 1019 comments
by Oui - Sep 1022 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 925 comments
by gmoke - Sep 87 comments
by ATinNM - Sep 833 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 5200 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 438 comments
by Oui - Sep 447 comments
by ARGeezer - Sep 428 comments
by Cat - Sep 34 comments
by john_evans - Sep 253 comments
by Bernard - Sep 182 comments