The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
But if I pay an invoice from a private hospital instead then the someone who fixes my leg IS, magically, now "productive".
The people are the same: it's only the "enterprise model" that's different, but I'm now paying a return to rentier capitalists on top of the actual costs of my treatment.
Now I happen to believe that markets are a more efficient mechanism for allocating resources than centralised planning and "the State".
So I don't believe in a State distinct from its citizens, any more than I believe in the deeply toxic "Private" sector market to which we are accustomed.
What we need IMHO are markets without rentiers and without profits: which Dr Yunus of Grameen Bank calls a "Not for Loss" enterprise model.
This is now actually perfectly possible within a consensual partnership-based enterprise model based upon what the French know as "contrats de societe" (as opposed to our good old Anglo Saxon "contrats de mandat"). "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
If the NHS fixes your leg, the profit - well, there is no profit.
So the real motivation is naked, wobbly-jowled, snout-smacking greed, mixed in with some old-fashioned quasi-imperial xenophobia.
The hatred of France and of socialist economies is based on the fact that state management makes it harder to strip-mine economies for personal gain.
Money recirculates to workers instead, which is not what should happen at all.
In the same way there can be no such thing as "Public Sector" investment because all "investment" is by definition "Private" (ie through a Corporation).
So the Public Sector may only borrow (from Private Banks) to invest - hence fantasies like Gordon Brown's "Golden Rule", National Debts,and the rest of the surreal nonsense that passes for national accounts.
It's all bollocks of course, since there are a couple of ways that the Public Sector may maintain ownership of assets and still bring in long term "investment".
But you won't read about them in the FT,the Economist or any publication which looks to banks for advertising.
"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
by gmoke - Jul 4
by Oui - Jul 3 1 comment
by Oui - Jun 30 25 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 24 16 comments
by Oui - Jun 25 50 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 16 16 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 15 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 10 15 comments
by Oui - Jul 4
by Oui - Jul 3
by Oui - Jul 31 comment
by gmoke - Jul 2
by Oui - Jun 3025 comments
by Oui - Jun 301 comment
by Oui - Jun 296 comments
by Oui - Jun 2735 comments
by Oui - Jun 2550 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 2416 comments
by Oui - Jun 2310 comments
by Oui - Jun 2313 comments
by gmoke - Jun 22
by Oui - Jun 20
by Oui - Jun 1916 comments
by asdf - Jun 184 comments
by Oui - Jun 184 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 1616 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1514 comments