Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Convincing the countries of the former Eastern bloc that NATO membership was a co-requisite of EU membership must count as one of the most successful misinformation camapigns of European history. However, it has been used successfully on other countries such as Spain and Portugal, I think.

For some reason, Ireland and Finland have been immune to this.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 05:32:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ireland wouldn't sign on for a military alliance that included the UK. At this stage military neutrality has become an article of faith here.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 05:34:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
After Bush II, I wonder why anyone would still want to be part of a military alliance that includes the US.

But, even on this front, Bush is just a symptom, not the disease. That's what Atlanticists have a hard time realising.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 05:37:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, really? So if Putin or Ahmadinejad wanted to fly their captives through Shannon to be tortured, the Irish would let them?

Interesting concept of "neutrality"!

by Matt in NYC on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 08:06:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
WTF?

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 08:08:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What I'm saying: the CIA certainly doesn't think of Ireland as a "neutral" country.
by Matt in NYC on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 08:24:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Probably, if the price was right. Putin, no problem. Ahmadinejad maybe.

Aeroflot always operated through Shannon.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 08:13:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
At least the Russians would stop for a drink.....

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 08:15:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, it was always neutral against the Commies, but that's another matter.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 08:16:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 06:10:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"The general public opinion [in Finland] would be for a European security solution instead of NATO. But the politicians don't hold out much hope for this - the EU is not a military alliance and any security guarantees given by the EU states are not such as could offer real defence," she added.
I have an idea: let's put a Finn in charge of the European Defence Agency.

Hmmm, the head of the EDA is the HR for the CFSP, which is Javier Solana of NATO Serbia bombing campaign fame.

I was going to suggest Martti Ahtisaari [no other Finnish diplomats come to mind, sorry] to succeed Solana, but he's gotten himself embroiled in the Kosovo mess on the NATO side, so I don't know.

"It's the statue, man, The Statue."

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Apr 27th, 2007 at 06:20:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series