Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Rediff.com: Dalit queen, now brahmin messiah
Bhaujan Samaj Party chief Mayawati is the most intriguing character in the battle unfolding in the Uttar Pradesh assembly elections.
In the past, slogans like 'Brahmins, traders and the warrior caste should be kicked' used to be the mantra of electoral success when Kanshi Ram, her mentor and the founder of BSP, took his movement to the economically poor and socially condemned Dalits, who were in search of a leader and a political party.
Thirty years on, BSP politics has gifted Mayawati a unique political situation.
In UP, Mayawati, as everyone knows and as the successive elections results have proved, has undisputed hold over the Dalit votes.
In the last election in UP, she secured 98 seats out of 403 seats with 23 per cent of the vote share.
In UP, Dalits constitute around 21 per cent of the electorate and it stands to her credit that she is able to transfer her share of votes to any candidate or party she chooses and that too at her price.
As a result, paradoxically, she is able to give nominations to non-Dalit candidates.
Mayawati is so confident about the loyalty of her 'vote bank' that in public meetings she has accepted that she takes money from Thakur-Brahmin candidates to run her party.
In the last elections in UP in 2002, she gave a big chunk of the BSP tickets to Thakurs. But Thakurs who got elected on BSP tickets were uncomfortable with 'Dalit politcs' and they deserted her and her party.
This time, too, under the influence of her advisor and party leader Satish Mishra, Mayawati has created history. (Mishra helps her in legal matters related to the 'Taj Corridor Case' in which Mayawati is implicated).
For the first time, she has given tickets to 89 Brahmins. This may seem audacious. It is indeed unprecedented in the caste-ridden society where social prejudices and identities are at the very core of political action-reactions.
An interesting scenario is opening in the coming UP election. Mayawati needs the undivided votes of Brahmins to make a significant impact in UP while her arch rival, Chief Minister Mulayam Singh Yadav is counting on Muslims voting en masse in his favour to add to his loyal constituency of Yadavs.
Mayawati has 'transferable votes' -- unlike even Sonia Gandhi. The Congress president enjoys a good image and the admiration of the people but as was proven in the last few elections, her charisma simply doesn't translate into votes at the end of the day. Least of all, Sonia Gandhi is unable to help political allies of her Congress party win elections.
Behanji, as she is known amongst her cadres, Mayawati is a one-woman-army leading the BSP. She has this time found a new slogan: 'Brahmin will blow the bugle and the elephant [BSP's symbol] will make progress'.
...
She has indeed bargained hard and profitably.
She openly asked upper caste candidates, 'I have votes, what can you offer me?'
She doesn't care for niceties and sophistication. She is openly contemptuous of middle class sensitivities over issues like corruption.
She thinks quickly, changes tack quickly, and is mindful only that the Dalits are still backing her.
Her big drawback is that she has formed the government twice in the past with the help of Bhartiya Janata Party. Her credibility on issues like secularism, corruption, democratic norms and the constitutional rights of backward classes is not inspiring.
Mayawati is a doer and if she decides to act on law and order or other issues, she can get things done. However, Yadavs and Kurmis dub her 'dictatorial' in her behavior while other backward castes like Kushwaha, Mauryas, Bhar, Nai and Dhobis who are little above Dalits in the social structure have been dissatisfied with her because she is not strongly fighting for quotas and reservations for them.
If she indeed succeeds in forming the government in Lucknow in mid-May with a combination of Dalit and Brahmin votes, the biggest loser will be the BJP.
And, it stands to reason when she says that Mulayam can only win the forthcoming election with clandestine, tactical help from the BJP.

Is Mayawati Indian answer to Ms Segolene Royal? Maverick Indian politician known for her intemperance, arrogance and unpredictability is of course cannot be compared directly given their respective resumes. Mayawati was embroiled in many corruption scandals, it's doubtful she has any ideas about socialism or Karl Marx and Rosa Luxembourg. But she has hostile press, her campaign is rather modest without any gimmicks and celebrities, just meetings with people and talking and talking. No Indian politician can survive reading prepared speeches - no one seems to carry any notes. This is the reason why Indian politicians are immune to attacks in media, media is at large not relevant here and biased pollsters as well. Nobody predicted Sonia Gandhi's victory in 2004 and this time with Mayawati was no exception.
by FarEasterner on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 07:53:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Excellent catch. Thank you

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 09:33:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Still no reaction. Probably this is wrong site to discuss anything beyond your borders.
by FarEasterner on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 09:36:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But she has hostile press, her campaign is rather modest without any gimmicks and celebrities, just meetings with people and talking and talking. No Indian politician can survive reading prepared speeches - no one seems to carry any notes. This is the reason why Indian politicians are immune to attacks in media, media is at large not relevant here and biased pollsters as well.

You have pointed this out before. What I want to know is, what fraction of the nearly 200M people of Uttar Pradesh has she met, or have seen her at a rally, and how do the rest decide who to vote for?

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 09:39:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I did not count. Indian politicians make lots of meetings then from time to time embark on yatras to highlight misdeeds of incumbent government. Anyone want to listen is coming and rallies and road shows are very well attended. Curiously good show does not necessarily turn into votes - prince charming Rahul Gandhi shows were very good but failed to impress voters.
by FarEasterner on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 09:44:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What I am questioning is anyone's ability to have direct contact sith more than a tiny fraction of the voters of Uttar Pradesh. So, then, do people propagate their impressions by word of mouth? Why don't people trust what they hear on the radio or seeon TV or read on the papers? How many people get their political information from the radio, TV, or press? Do people vote as they are told by community leaders? Are there patron/client relations at play, especially in rural areas? How does caste influence things? For instance, there are the following bits in the text you quote:
In UP, Mayawati, as everyone knows and as the successive elections results have proved, has undisputed hold over the Dalit votes.

...

Mayawati is so confident about the loyalty of her 'vote bank' that in public meetings she has accepted that she takes money from Thakur-Brahmin candidates to run her party. In the last elections in UP in 2002, she gave a big chunk of the BSP tickets to Thakurs. But Thakurs who got elected on BSP tickets were uncomfortable with 'Dalit politcs' and they deserted her and her party.

...

For the first time, she has given tickets to 89 Brahmins. This may seem audacious. It is indeed unprecedented in the caste-ridden society where social prejudices and identities are at the very core of political action-reactions.

...

She doesn't care for niceties and sophistication. She is openly contemptuous of middle class sensitivities over issues like corruption.

Patron/client, caste and religious relations seem to play a huge role which repels the western "liberal democracy" sensitivity. Now, I think to some extent there is a mythology of "clean politics" in "liberal democracies" which hides the fact that patronage is alive and kicking in the business world and among the elite and, as long as that is kept hidden from the middle class, the "fair play" mythology can be used to defuse the threat of the middle and low classes organising. Look at the lack of "shock" over Sarkozy's cozy relations with the largest capitalists in France. However, clientelism will be used by the mass media under the control of the elite to discredit candidates from the left.

I hope that makes sense.

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 10:40:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think the main difference between Western democracy and Indian is panchayat system where people chose few persons to rule small area and who elect next level functionaries. This is how party machines work too. Politicians of course come from different background, family connections and money play role but not always. India witnessed low-cast revolution in 1980-1990's and many new leaders with humble background come to fold. Why? Because they are election genies who can quickly communicate with diversed and divided electorate. People of course make they mind differently, sometimes somewhere goondas (local bandits) try to influence people preferences. In 2000's Election Commission of India has made tremendous work to ensure fair and transparent elections preventing any rigging. So mostly people decide themselves, often voting tactically to dislodge unpopular government.
by FarEasterner on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 10:58:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What is the next level uf administration up from the Panchayat?

By the way, I have suggested earlier (without knowing much in detail about either) that Switzerland and India should be studied as models of organisation to suggest ways in which the EU can better organise itself in the future. I would therefore greatly appreciate it if you could write a diary about the sociopolitical organisation of India (as far as it's possible to generalise local organisation across states), and how one gets from the Panchayat to the Federal level

Bush is a symptom, not the disease.

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 11:09:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
They have many names you won't find in Wikipedia. By the way I have strong desire to rewrite a lot of Wiki's Indian history articles if I have time. But given my schedule I don't know when.
Generally it's just next groupings - cluster of villages, subdistricts, districts (talukas) and so on.
And of course I forget to say you - how people find information  about political parties and their programs - by word mouth, from political activists (party workers), sympathisers and of course press though biased information anyway sifted through lively discussions. It was always amazing to see how Indians are socially active comparing to Russia where civil society is simply in defunct state. When I was working as a social science researcher I started with gathering information through questionnairs and interaction with people. I met maybe thousands people and found how they feel lonely and eagerly telling about their worries to anybody who would listen to them. Long time nobody wanted to listen. And they resigned to their plight. Here everything is different and I believe Indian experience with democracy is exemplary and given rise of Asian giants in futute would be more attention to what is going on here.
by FarEasterner on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 12:32:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What would we say? I'm not sure who here follows Indian internal politics closely enough to comment - but we're glad to hear about it and learn.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 09:43:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not sure what to say, not knowing much about Indian politics, but I am glad that you posted these here.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Fri May 11th, 2007 at 09:54:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series