The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The pyramids must have been rather alien to Islamic Egypt
Which islam do you mean ? The current increasingly fundamentalist egypt only has its roots in the Nasser revolution of 48, where the muslim brotherhood were invited into his government (they declined).
You only have to go on the streets of the poorer districts to see the truth that culturally the egyptians do not have austere traditions, they are largely a party people who love music and dancing (and drinking booze and smoking dope). So, if there is a disinclination towards intellectual examination of history, I don't think it comes from islam.
I have often suspected that the egyptians know that their history is pretty complicated with much that conflicts with islam and several points of disconnection with ancient egypt. Like most peoples they want to be proud of their country and so effect a cultural disinterest as there is a difference between knowing something and having to assimilate that and thinking something is possible but let's not look too closely. keep to the Fen Causeway
Perhaps it is a testament to the Egyptians' appreciation for their cultural heritage that the pharaonic mounments were not destroyed or defaced. Well, not except by those who destroyed or damaged them in the act of stealing them, like for example the Champollion at tomb of Seti I. I'm sure he was just showing his respect when he removed those walls.
*Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
The one-meter-wide nose on the face is missing. A legend that the nose was broken off by a cannon ball fired by Napoléon's soldiers still survives, as do diverse variants indicting British troops, Mamluks, and others. However, sketches of the Sphinx by Frederick Lewis Norden made in 1737 and published in 1755 illustrate the Sphinx without a nose. The Egyptian historian al-Maqrizi, writing in the fifteenth century, attributes the vandalism to Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr, a Sufi fanatic from the khanqah of Sa'id al-Su'ada. In 1378, upon finding the Egyptian peasants making offerings to the Sphinx in the hope of increasing their harvest, Sa'im al-Dahr was so outraged that he destroyed the nose. Al-Maqrizi describes the Sphinx as the "Nile talisman" on which the locals believed the cycle of inundation depended.
Generally, as I understand the wars of conquests, the muslims were far far too busy fighting each other's schisms to worry too much about artefacts and buildings that were obviously abandoned. By and large, so long as (non-Abrahammatic) peoples converted, everything was pretty much left alone. I'm pretty sure that Taliban are the only muslims to have destroyed a non-functional religious site. keep to the Fen Causeway
So how does that contradict the claim that they were "alien", and that there was no cultural continuity, or interest in systematically exploring them? Bush is a symptom, not the disease.
Here are my Western blinders at work: "nos ancêtres les grècques". I omitted the Persians. Bush is a symptom, not the disease.
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 15
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 8 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 31 8 comments
by gmoke - Dec 29
by Oui - Jan 1513 comments
by Oui - Jan 149 comments
by Oui - Jan 142 comments
by Oui - Jan 132 comments
by Oui - Jan 131 comment
by Oui - Jan 126 comments
by Oui - Jan 103 comments
by Oui - Jan 9
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 86 comments
by Oui - Jan 8
by Oui - Jan 84 comments
by Oui - Jan 7
by Oui - Jan 62 comments
by Oui - Jan 3
by Oui - Jan 212 comments
by Oui - Jan 11 comment
by Oui - Dec 31
by Oui - Dec 315 comments