The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The Return of NILF Over the years, we have mentioned on more than one occasion the not-as-dirty-as-it-sounds measure, NILF. No, it has nothing to do with moms -- rather, it stands for Not In Labor Force. It is one of the reasons the official BLS unemployment rate is actually understating the actual unemployment rate. A quick primer on how this works: The Unemployment rate is depicted as a percentage, and like all percentages, it is actually a fraction. You take the total number of people in the labor pool, the total number of workers: Employed Individuals _______ = Percent Employed Total Labor Pool Subtract the percent employed from 100% and you get the unemployment rate. Most of us think about the unemployment rate going down due to more people getting jobs. But there's also another way the official unemployment rate can go down. It happens when the denominator -- the bottom number of the fraction -- goes down. And that is what has been occurring again recently. The Labor Pool has shrunk, making the unemployment rate look better than it actually is. [...]
Over the years, we have mentioned on more than one occasion the not-as-dirty-as-it-sounds measure, NILF. No, it has nothing to do with moms -- rather, it stands for Not In Labor Force.
It is one of the reasons the official BLS unemployment rate is actually understating the actual unemployment rate.
A quick primer on how this works: The Unemployment rate is depicted as a percentage, and like all percentages, it is actually a fraction. You take the total number of people in the labor pool, the total number of workers:
Employed Individuals _______ = Percent Employed Total Labor Pool
Total Labor Pool
Subtract the percent employed from 100% and you get the unemployment rate.
Most of us think about the unemployment rate going down due to more people getting jobs. But there's also another way the official unemployment rate can go down. It happens when the denominator -- the bottom number of the fraction -- goes down.
And that is what has been occurring again recently. The Labor Pool has shrunk, making the unemployment rate look better than it actually is.
[...]
I don't get his terminology, though. If you calculate the percentage he indicates (assuming "Labor Pool" = total working-age population), you get the employment rate (called by OECD employment/population ratio). If you subtract that from 100%, you don't get the unemployment rate, you get the percentage of (unemployed persons + NILF).
Either that or he's calling "Labor Pool" what he elsewhere calls "Labor Force".
Am I missing something, as they say?
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2 2 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 21 10 comments
by gmoke - Nov 12 6 comments
by Oui - Dec 96 comments
by Oui - Dec 88 comments
by Oui - Dec 717 comments
by Oui - Dec 54 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 32 comments
by Oui - Dec 214 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 22 comments
by Oui - Dec 26 comments
by Oui - Dec 112 comments
by Oui - Dec 14 comments
by Oui - Nov 306 comments
by Oui - Nov 289 comments
by Oui - Nov 276 comments
by gmoke - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 268 comments
by Oui - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 2513 comments
by Oui - Nov 2318 comments
by Oui - Nov 22