The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I am not sure what you mean by "dismissal of law and natural moral?" Please explain.
Strict adherence to religious practices means you follow them above all, i.e. if there is conflict with law, you prefer the religious rules. By natural moral I basically mean the Goldden Rule and basic human compassion: strict adherence to religious law overrules that, too. (See Abraham on the mountain.)
there have been many political commentators who have used this term
Yes, there have been. That doesn't establish why you feel justified to use it, anonymous reference doesn't establish authoritative use. Almost everyone in the world has been called fascist by someone.
these modern movements took their inspiration from the Muslim Brotherhood after the creation of Israel and the presence of western oil interests in the region.
Neither Wahhabism nor Salafism is modern. If you mean that modern followers of Wahhabism and Salafism have been cross-pollinated by Muslim Brotherhood thinking, that's a rather weaker point than your original, and one could say just as well that the cross-pollination went both ways (and many other ways).
economic development and investment
Do you think specifying that makes the intrusiveness of your policy different?
great prosperity for who exactly?
Saudis, Kuweitis, Bahrainis, Kataris, citizens of the UAE, Oman, and to some extent even Lybia. You seem to lack any knowledge about standards of living there.
I would not expect coherent insight on this matter from him other than "it's hard work."
You have praised him before for being on the ball where Clinton wasn't. Coherence seems to lack here.
they became our problem on 9/11/01 and the root cause of that needs to be addressed.
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, not even with what you suppose to be its root cause, there was no Islamic fundamentalist terrorism in Iraq before 9/11. There is now, and it is on a scale never seen before in other countries. And part of them are the death squads of US allies in government.
And on a theoretical level, no, it didn't became 'your problem' on 9/11, it became when the US took over the Middle East from the British Empire, and no, your problem still doesn't justify attempts to rule people instead of letting them self-rule.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by IdiotSavant - Oct 14 4 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 14 10 comments
by Oui - Oct 15 34 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 10 70 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 17 2 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 15
by Oui - Oct 11 39 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 8 76 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 172 comments
by Oui - Oct 1534 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 15
by Oui - Oct 1411 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 1410 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 144 comments
by Oui - Oct 1139 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 1111 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1070 comments
by Oui - Oct 822 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 876 comments
by Oui - Oct 329 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 223 comments
by Oui - Oct 25 comments
by Oui - Oct 1
by Oui - Sep 2872 comments
by ARGeezer - Sep 2729 comments
by gmoke - Sep 26
by Oui - Sep 263 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2626 comments