The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
"we should invade their [Muslim] countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."
This article reads as if one day islamofascists descended from outerspace and started attacking the United States. It's difficult to bridge such an incredible emotional gap. It seems that there is not a common reference point.
There are technical things as well. Let's look at the word fascist. It has a meaning. In particular, Laurence Britt in his article Fascism Anyone? compared the following fascist states:
Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Franco's Spain, Salazar's Portugal, Papadopoulos's Greece, Pinochet's Chile, and Suharto's Indonesia
Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism.
Disdain for the importance of human rights.
Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause.
The supremacy of the military/avid militarism.
A controlled mass media.
Obsession with national security.
Religion and ruling elite tied together.
Power of corporations protected.
Power of labor suppressed or eliminated.
Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts.
Obsession with crime and punishment.
Rampant cronyism and corruption.
Outside the United States there is a belief that this list would apply to the US and Israel.
It is convenient that the war against Islam started a little after the cold war ended. Why did we not notice how evil the Muslims were before that? Why was (and is) Saudi Arabia so well funded? Why are there no surveys that show Muslims are any more violent than US citizens? (If you got one, please link I really would be interested.)
When dealing with the horrors of the World Trade Towers, what about the horrors of the equivalent of 1,400 9/11's that the US inflicted on Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia? It was not just the lie that was the Gulf of Tonklin incident. It was the refusal to allow North and South Vietnam a democratic vote as mandated by the United Nations, because South Vietnam would almost certainly vote in a way the US did not want.
The US has always chosen violence as its main method of diplomacy. They have always backed despots in order to secure short-term gains. "He may be a bastard, but he is our bastard" summarises the heart of US foreign policy since WWII. There is a reason that the US spends more on military than the rest of the world combined. There is a reason that the US was the target of Bin Laden.
This is how the rest of the world views the US, including now, a large number of it's friends:
aspiring to genteel poverty
Fascism is the pathology of abuse for its own sake. There's always a smokescreen of justification and rationalisation based on how different and aggressive The Other is. But the core issue is a need to abuse and control other human beings, purely for the sake of abuse and control.
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 19 26 comments
by Bernard - Jul 16 35 comments
by Oui - Jul 14 3 comments
by Oui - Jul 21 2 comments
by Oui - Jul 19 27 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 14 15 comments
by ARGeezer - Jul 10 19 comments
by eurogreen - Jul 8 8 comments
by Oui - Jul 231 comment
by Oui - Jul 212 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 1926 comments
by Oui - Jul 1927 comments
by Oui - Jul 181 comment
by Bernard - Jul 1635 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 1415 comments
by Oui - Jul 143 comments
by ARGeezer - Jul 1019 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 1027 comments
by Oui - Jul 98 comments
by eurogreen - Jul 88 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 532 comments
by gmoke - Jul 439 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 252 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 26106 comments
by Oui - Jun 219 comments