Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
..as I wrote, Confederations are not lasting institutions

Aren't you missing something?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland

Is 700 years "lasting"?

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Tue Jun 19th, 2007 at 01:59:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Tell a lie.

It was only a Confederation for about 500 years....and then went off the rails....

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Tue Jun 19th, 2007 at 02:05:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
A confederation, in modern political terms, is usually limited to a permanent union of sovereign states for common action in relation to other states.

In fact it was the formation of Switzerland that created the term Confederation, but the Helvetic Confederation technically functions according to the modern concept of Federation.

I can't find my preferred article on that, so I'll just direct you to the Wikipedia's article on the subject.

Switzerland is often used by Federalists has an example of the lasting characteristics of Federations.


You might find me At The Edge Of Time.

by Luis de Sousa (luis[dot]a[dot]de[dot]sousa[at]gmail[dot]com) on Tue Jun 19th, 2007 at 02:41:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have mentioned before that Switzerland and India should be used as case studies to plan for the EU's political organisation.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Jun 19th, 2007 at 05:02:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series