The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Exchange-traded products are standarised and to some extent trackable (at least in terms of volume outstanding and traded, etc) because of regulatory requirements and those of the exchange itself. Banks provide bespoke financial products to their customers "over the counter", with very limited regulatory oversight or reporting requirements. Financial derivatives and "swaps" can be (and are) used to circumvent regulatory limits, hide transactions and holdings, reduce one's tax base, etc.
I'm suggesting that, if there were no OTC market it would be less difficult (in principle) to have an idea of where the risk is.
On the other hand, it's in the OTC market where "financial innovation" takes place. Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
Some hedge funds are taking huge positions on listed derivative markets. It's just that when they fail through listed markets the boom is spread a bit to the clearing exchange members and it happens earlier through margin calls.
Whereas in the OTC market you have only one counterparty that takes the boom (or a chain of counterparties).
AFAIK, there is no more regulatory reporting requirement in OTC than in listed.
Banks are supposed to monitor their risk and regulators supposed to monitor banks risk monitoring. If a bank blows up, the boom goes to in order:
Do you mean no less regulatory requirement? Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
OTC requirement = listed requirement.
I dont' mean the OTC are not another (possibly bigger) time bomb, I mean it is possible to blow up the planet by taking risk on listed stuff alone, and it has already been done, that listed bomb is cocked ready to set off.
I've seen some CDS on baskets of corporate lenders in europe which, according to some basic industry-standad default event models (thoroughly untested outside of the highly benevolent period of low refinancing rates), have their price go from zero to full pay for changes of just 1 bp at a certain threshold value of the borrower's spread. These threshold values are just a percentage point away from the present rates.
If the corresponding (listed) CDO really fares like the model suggest (symmetric of its default swap), this is going to be ugly, and it will happen, not overnight, but in just weeks as bankruptcies pile up. Pierre
by gmoke - May 16
by gmoke - May 6
by rifek - May 4 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 26 1 comment
by gmoke - Apr 20 1 comment
by Oui - May 173 comments
by Oui - May 16
by Oui - May 141 comment
by Oui - May 13
by Oui - May 87 comments
by rifek - May 43 comments
by Oui - May 42 comments
by Oui - May 4
by Oui - May 1
by Oui - Apr 27
by gmoke - Apr 261 comment
by Oui - Apr 25
by Oui - Apr 23
by Oui - Apr 22
by gmoke - Apr 201 comment
by Oui - Apr 204 comments