The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
In America, both the President and Vice President are elected. It's known when you vote that the VP will replace the President if the President cannot perform his or her duties. So you go into the voting booth knowing that. Apparently it's also a fine way of keeping a country from impeaching the President: pick a nasty VP...
And every 4 years there is an election.
When Tony Blair was elected, did people know Gordon Brown would be his successor if Blair stepped down? Or could Blair pick anyone he chose, so long as they were of the Labor party?
Also, I don't understand the term limits. Do they have them? Why could Blair step down and appoint a successor instead of having to serve out a term at the end of which would be a general election? They have something like "confidence" votes, right? To see if they can stay on? And if they win, then the only thing that prevents them from stepping down and putting a friend in charge is a Parliamentary election? Are those done on a regular schedule? "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 22 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 26
by Cat - Jan 25 18 comments
by Oui - Jan 9 21 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 13 28 comments
by gmoke - Jan 20
by Oui - Jan 15 90 comments
by gmoke - Jan 7 13 comments
by Oui - Jan 2725 comments
by Cat - Jan 2518 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 223 comments
by Oui - Jan 219 comments
by Oui - Jan 21
by Oui - Jan 20
by Oui - Jan 1839 comments
by Oui - Jan 1590 comments
by Oui - Jan 144 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 1328 comments
by Oui - Jan 1215 comments
by Oui - Jan 1120 comments
by Oui - Jan 1031 comments
by Oui - Jan 921 comments
by NBBooks - Jan 810 comments
by Oui - Jan 717 comments
by gmoke - Jan 713 comments
by Oui - Jan 68 comments