The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Because there's such an extended primary season (well over a year in the current election), with the exception of voters in Iowa, New Hampshire, and the perhaps quarter of the population that's deeply involved in politics, no one is paying attention.
Iowa tends to create a huge bump for the winner in the primaries until what's called super Tuesday, when a large number of large states all vote at once. So whoever comes out of Iowa with a win has an automatic advantage going into super Tuesday.
This year, super Tuesday is going to be even more super, as more and more states vote on that day.
Some states, like Florida, have jumped clear past super Tuesday on Feb. 5, to right after New Hampshire. There have been persistent rumors that Florida well attempt to vote earlier than New Hampshire. The DNC, Democratic National Committee, the federal party, has made clear that if Florida does so, it's delegates will be decertified. Which means that Florida voters will have no say in who the Democratic candidates is.
If Florida jumps, the, New York, California, and Illinois are likely to jump clear past New Hampshire in response. At that point the DNC has to either tell New Hampshire that they've lost their place in line, or decertify the results of elections in New York, California, and Illinois.
Remember that voting early generates about $250 million in economic stimulus for New Hampshire in hotel and food costs for campaigns and reporters. This is not something to be sneezed at.
We could very easily arrive at a situation in which almost a third of the elected delegates have been decertified. Which means that the role of the 800 superdelegates (DNC members, governors, Congress, Senate, etc) will be magnified, because a close election in which the winner of Iowa took early states only to lose later on, leaving them without a majority from delegates allocated by voters. Sounds like gibberish. Here's a chart detailing how 2004 DNC delegates were allocated.
There are roughly 4,300 delegates. If you start yanking the delegates from California (~500) Florida, Illinois, New York (~250 each), that 1,250 delegates gone. So now you have a base of 3,050 delegates. Around 2,250 of those are elected in the primary election. The rest are superdelegates. The more states that decide they want to leapfrog, the more enhanced the role of superdelegates in the election.
I've got to go know, but I may post a diary on this later. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
At that point the DNC needs to take the calendar away from the states and institute some sort of standard procedure. Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
The US is a federal system. Primary elections were only instituted in the early 20th century, and are subject to state law. Different states have different laws, and they always have.
The poor, blacks, and women have all at one time or another been disenfrachised. Up until the 1840's various states required citizens to hold a certain amount of land property in order to vote. This led to actual political warfare, that being the kind involving guns and militias, in Rhode Island in 1841 or 1842, called the Dorr Rebellion. Rhode Island then had a law requiring the ownership of property worth $134 to vote. By the 1840's this had disenfranchised all but 40% of the white males in the state.
The story of how the abolition of class limitations on voting changed America is largely unknown, but the story of who women and blacks became able to vote is much better known.
Back to my point. The DNC can't tell states what to do, they can only threaten to decertify delegates. And that creates the potential for the final say on the nominee to be determined by superdelegates. And it also, may force Iowa and New Hampshire to move back their calendars. So far as I know, there's nothing prohibiting Iowa and New Hampshire from moving back as early as November 9, 2007.
It's a mess, and it's going to be very dependent on Dean as the DNC chair to clean up. I don't envy his position. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
Is there then any formal reason why only two parties gets primaries organised by the states? Or to put it another way, can other parties get primaries and ge3t the states to pay for it? Has any party tried? Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 7 2 comments
by Oui - Feb 4 45 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 2 8 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 26 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 31 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 22 3 comments
by Cat - Jan 25 63 comments
by Oui - Jan 9 21 comments
by Oui - Feb 7
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 72 comments
by Oui - Feb 445 comments
by Oui - Feb 315 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 28 comments
by Oui - Feb 2112 comments
by Oui - Feb 16 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 313 comments
by gmoke - Jan 29
by Oui - Jan 2736 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 263 comments
by Cat - Jan 2563 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 223 comments
by Oui - Jan 2110 comments
by Oui - Jan 21
by Oui - Jan 20
by gmoke - Jan 20
by Oui - Jan 1841 comments
by Oui - Jan 1591 comments
by Oui - Jan 145 comments