Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Now to define 'carbon content' of a good or service...

It's not the carbon content of the good or service, but the amount of carbon-equivalent of the greenhouse gases released by the production process. But this would make it tricky to tax automotive fuel for private consumption. But, in the case of final products the consumer can be charged for the expected environmental impact at the time of purchase, not from actual environmental impact at a later date.

Note that generally the 'carbon content' of the inputs is higher than the carbon content of the outputs of a production process, and the difference is released.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Jun 4th, 2007 at 06:33:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
One could take a sample "good" and incinerate it, and measure the concentration of various greenhouse gases.

For services, the entire carbon content of the inputs is released as the inputs are consumed.

Now I'm thinking that in this model cow farts are a good way to avoid taxation. So if the carbon tax were high enough it would become economically efficient to use animals instead of motor vehicles for agricultural work and local transport. It would be an amusing return of the horse and ox economy.

Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Jun 4th, 2007 at 06:43:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series