Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Some ideas to mitigate the peculiarity of the electoral system, highlighted by this diary.

  1. Increase the percentage of list seats.

  2. Apportion list seats at the national level.

  3. Fix the total size of the legislature (which will consequently be a bit less proportional than if overhang seats are allowed).

Presumably practical politicians in Germany are not much bothered about the problem.
by Gary J on Fri Jun 8th, 2007 at 12:36:56 PM EST
So far, overhang mandates in the minimum 400 (1949) to 656 (1990, 1994, 1998) seat Bundestag have been rare, though more common lately:

  1. 16
  2. 5(+2)
  3. 13
  4. 16
  5. 6
  6. 0
  7. 2
  8. 1
1976, 1972, 1969, 1965: 0
  1. 5
  2. 3
  3. 2
  4. 2

Obviously, overhang mandates are likely when even the largest party is well below 50%, that is, when there are numerous parliamentary parties. With the PDS in East Germany, overhang mandates became much more likely (and as you can see, when they failed on the 5% in 2002, overhangs were temporarily reduced).

Overhang mandate melting would count as real problem only when the government majority is hair-thin.

I note that in the diary I simplified the system. In truth even the seats apportitioned for the individual states ars not fixed: there is a compensation system between the states, primarily with the aim to shuffle fraction votes. This can reduce overhangs. (And then there is the 5% limit, and rules for parties under 5% with direct mandates, and the fraction rounding that reduces the minimum number of seats...)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri Jun 8th, 2007 at 07:05:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series