Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
After a first search, I think you mis-remember what you heard. I find Gabriel argued with higher CO2 emissions in the debate over Steinkohle vs. Braunkohle in the distribution of 2008-2012 emission certificates -- correctly saying that sub-bitumenous coal has higher CO2 emissions per electricity generated.

But I search further, maybe he did say it about nuclear, too.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Jul 12th, 2007 at 09:52:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm pretty sure that it was nuclear vs. coal. He said it on some TV show, probably "Sabine Christiansen". Just a small sentence, but it stuck in my head.

"If you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles." Sun Tzu
by Turambar (sersguenda at hotmail com) on Fri Jul 13th, 2007 at 12:31:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Checking further, I found two different things.

On one hand, there really was an SPD politician who made that claim, but it was current party chairman Kurt Beck.

On the other hand, I find that the below referenced Öko-Institut numbers come from a study asked for by Gabriel's ministerium (the full study is here (pdf!)), which looked separately at CO2 per 1 kW electricity production and combined 2kW heat and 1kW electricity production. Only the latter comparison shows only block heating gas as better than German nuclear+oil heating, so I think Gabriel shouldn1t be the person arguing for coal beating nuclear.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Sat Jul 14th, 2007 at 01:22:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series