Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
I doubt whether it's ever been purely intra day. IMHO the trading relationship between BP and Goldman over the last ten years would not withstand detailed examination and could be one of the biggest "bezzles" (as Galbraith had it) of recent years.

But there are - as you know better than most - many ways to skin that cat.

Granted these are "frictional" costs, but to me the billions made in the last few years are not chump change. Why else have investment banks been queuing up to enter the area: and where are their profits going to come from? (apart from prime brokerage and trading off their own clients that is - Chinese Walls are full of chinks)

They ARE relatively speaking, minor compared to the overall market.

It's a similar "relational" point to that re the whole oil in Euro's / Oil Bourse conspiracy nonsense: oil dollar traffic is significant, but a relatively small, but increasing, part of general dollar traffic.

How does one define "cosmic" in other words!

Re regulation, do you think current regulators are much better placed than Maggie's/Major's?

They still have very limited access to the trading data they need: even if they get it, they have very limited competence and resources to make sense of it(since the good people are, by and large, poached by the industry) and they have limited enforcement power.

Apart from that, things are better, yes.

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Tue Jul 17th, 2007 at 06:35:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:


Occasional Series