The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
But I find the identification of socialist policies (let's call them by their true name) with protectionism bizarre.
One of the key points made by Polanyi in questioning market fundamentalism, was the protectionism is natural, while lazziez faire is planned. Which is to say the lazziez faire can only occur under a set of conditions where things like the limited liability company, strong contract law, and stable property rights exist.
So lazziez faire requires state intervention in order to exist. Can you imagine the cost if the limited liability insurance provided by governments to publically owned companies had to underwritten by private insurers? Or would they even be able to find an insurer willing to take that risk at any cost?
Remember that socialism and protectionism come from much the same place, social self defense against the tendency of the market to break all things down to matters of maxmizing utility regardless of the human cost.
It's the triumph of the formal over the substantive (Weber), so that unmitigated capitalism falls prey to sacrifice the human aspect of life in pursuit of ideological goals. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by Oui - Oct 26 9 comments
by gmoke - Oct 26
by Oui - Oct 3110 comments
by Oui - Oct 269 comments
by Oui - Oct 267 comments
by Oui - Oct 2536 comments
by Oui - Oct 253 comments
by Oui - Oct 249 comments
by Oui - Oct 244 comments
by Oui - Oct 20
by Oui - Oct 195 comments
by Oui - Oct 193 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 187 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 18
by Oui - Oct 184 comments
by Oui - Oct 18
by Oui - Oct 174 comments
by Oui - Oct 17
by Oui - Oct 163 comments
by Oui - Oct 161 comment
by Oui - Oct 159 comments