Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
If you have two new phones you can have video and sound in a conversation these days. Not much used as it is new and a bit expensive, so there is no problems in using it real-time.

If you want a simple rig for a better quality live-feed, a handheld digital camera (with video function), a small laptop with a card for wireless network (preferably in a backpack) and access to a wireless net is what I would go for. That is more citizen journalist equipment, more to be used if you have time to prepare before the event. It can then be wired continuasly to a webpage or a third person who can edit it if necessary.

The PP UK looks like it has some problems setting sails. I do not have the specifics, but generally the pirate parties has lots of tech-savvy people. What is primarily needed is organisation-savvy people. So do join and you will find you have lots of help with kubuntu if you need it. :-)

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 11:12:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Hey, I clicked on the link, click click, and came across this...


So--okay, off I go--I anticipate huge gains for the greens, because I've always been a bit of a 20% person,  you know: 20% roughly get it like I do, and so I'm in a minority.  So:




Lib Dems!  (I'm thinking England--(:

(That's me trying out one of those new smileys (o"

So now, if I go Pirate...but hold on...

Lib Dems?



Pirate Party!

The range is so wide, it's hard to know where to start, and is a party even necessary?

A party is always necessary!  There should be a party every two weeks, and it should be called "You Survived The Last Two Weeks, Yay!" party, but not everyone is invited....

heh heh hay!

They're invited if they can find an invitation.

I think your approach (and your successes) re: file sharing are completely avant garde, fighting real fights in real time, to everyone's benefit (those who lose are those who can afford--and how--to lose a bit...maybe that's my fantasy)...

But...I'm not a techie, though I think you're great (here I only include the techies with the beating hearts...cough cough!  I mean, if you know that thirty thousand euros [give or take the monetary imabalances in your various economies] is better than fifteen thousand euros; and if you know that fifty thousand euros is...twenty thousand euros-worth of a world resource...


I think that for me to join the Pirates is for the pirates to be very generous with their time and their brain power, and so far (Firefox Thunderbird Google Spybot Open Office)

Okay, a serious question.

I see google everywhere in these free applications.  No money down, no money later, but a subtle sign saying, "Google"

I've convinced myself that Google finance wikipedia and  their cahootsiness is why you can type in about any noun ("mountain" "iron" "Iraq" "Money" "Sex" "Seed") and the first (or second or third) page is...the wikipedia article.

I'm sure that can't be because it's the most wanted or the most linked, but it might be because it's the most read...but that's because it comes up first.

So...I'm an ignoramus.  Is Google (Evil!  They made their deal with China) doing good things?  Is there a plan, or is it...give it away, make sure it's good, watch the positive energy flow...?

Ach aye!

Splice the main brace!

Too strange...for words...

Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.

by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 07:19:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Google is much cleverer than the pirates are. The GooglePlan seems to be to create a range of irresistible applications that people can't live without.

This is unlikely the Microsoft approach, which is based on producing barely functional products from a position of aggressive contempt for the customer base, and throwing marketing at them until they stick to the wall.

But anyway.

Google is taking the long view. Google apps are just starting their play for world domination. Five years from now they'll be more obvious. Ten years from now they'll be more obvious still - while Microsoft will be struggling. Fifteen years from, if there's still an Internet, people will be running live Google apps on the distributed GoogleGrid.

The Pirates just want stuff for free because they want it. They don't really contribute anything. Are they responsible for Firefox and the rest? Not really, no.

Which is better? Neither. What the world needs is file sharing with micropayments. Download, pay a tiny sum. Cut out the record companies, and support creative artists directly.  

Will that happen? No. Because rewarding creative effort isn't something the pirates are interested in. Artists are supposed to be flattered that they have been deemed worthy of dowload and iPodification. Having to eat - not so important.

So the pirates are more interested in appearing to be rebels for the sake of it.

Only - you know - downloading MP3s really isn't the last word in social dissent, exactly.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 09:13:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I have a theory....

that there will always be someone who will do music/painting/photography/any other art you can think of
for no money.

How many photo books will remain unread because we have the weekly ET photo round up?

How many potential photo artists here will be unfairly removed from a potential cash source because someone redirects here for people to view their photos for free?

I think the money to be made from the arts will be made by artists.  Those who aspire can struggle, but an artist  is like the guy who walks tightropes between tall buildings illegally

I can download the entire works of Billy Holiday and a thousand other artists.  Why should I care if a person thinks they have a great hit on their hands?

An artist has (I think) a need to produce their art--I mean, they have an urge to produce art...and value is in the eyes ears taste buds skin and nose of the beholder, and artists are those who can get food--or maybe not....because art isn't a job, where you pick up a salary.

The craft may take time to learn, and applying the craft is maybe a worthily paid profession.  But Ry Cooder knew he was going to make his money from music by the age of fourteen.

So I think: make the best music you can; offer it out.    Play live--meet the public, whether by radio, or MP3s on the web, get it out there, and hocus pocus, like Firefox (have you ever paid them money?  Does the app work?)

Okay: I think the danger with micro payments as obligatory (whether legal or moral) is that the idea of deserved payment is the antithesis of the fee gig, the bring-a-bottle party (both of which do at least one person out of potential booty)...

Session musicians are right to have a union and charge union wages: they sell a skill.  Ditto mixers, recorders, videographers, sales people...

Ya know, I've always enjoyed Tom Waits, and I like it that he left Island to join a small label because (and maybe I paraphrase) "I liked their attitude."

Or: is the music supposed to have some musical effect, or is all the hard work supposed to be repaid in money?    When the police threw Fela Kuti's mother out of the first floor window of his compound...


...ya know, if the only money accrues to artists from countries in the lower half of the 177 classification, will art have suffered?

Ach aye!  

Would ET musicians be happy to produce an album of music for the listening pleasure of ETers without asking for cash?

And would they still be happy if the album became the most downloaded album in history?

I mean, if you can eat yesterday, today, and tomorrow, and if you get sick you can quickly see someone who can help you then you may well be better off than most...

I simply don't think it is fair to say the creators of Open Office, Spybot, and the like don't contribute...you were the one who put me onto Spybot--Free!  £0!!!

Isn't free software as unfair to the programmers as free music is to musicians?  But I LOVE free software--I get where I want to go without having to schlep at some pointless task.  Shouldn't it be the same with music?  

And for the musicians who can't create without being "full time", there have always been avenues...there are worlds where music is breakfast, lunch, and dinner--I have a friend who has harboured his dream of leading his group to victory since he was fourteen!  He is now a DJ in Oslo (and very happy, thank you very much)...coz music was his passion, not just his own but  that of others...

Och aye!

I see no reason why one can't make great music and be a road sweeper, and I see no reason why a road sweeper should earn any less (or more) than anyone else.

Also (as if I hadn't banged on enough!), I see a clear difference between learning, say, the bassoon, where the time is long and the concerts are rare, and learning "popular music", where the notes are basically tonal and the riffs are mostly in four beat.  Folk music should earn its money from the folk...and it seem s live gigs are the way forward, with maybe some music sales possibilities...sorta like the freeware--for those who...

ach, maybe I mean: If us liberals aren't willing to cough up when we have the cash (I mean: donate to Open Source projects), then we are part of the other system....

Heh heh!

I think you should write a diary about the music aspect.  You have strong feelings about it, and experience, and I think it would be good to see your aspect laid out as you wish and...yes!..at length, with all the context you want...ya know...I sorta know where you're coming from, but where I live there are a lot of musicians who distinguish between

being paid for performing music


making music they enjoy playing/listening to

...to be a good pianist you need maybe two to three hours practice A DAY...for at least two or three days a  week.  Most of the jazzers teach by day.  I don't think they'd turn into Charles Mingus if they didn't have to teach...

And Charles Mingus was a pimp, among other things.

peer to peer--the pirate model is, I think, the future.  FREE ACCESS TO CULTURE!  ALL OF IT!

Wouldn't that be great if you had no money?

The whole "you could afford it but you won't pay" aspect is a separate cultural issue, I think, and really: when we're all happy to pay the real price--when we insist on paying the real price for our lifestyles from morning to evening...the world will change...cough cough!

Och, I sorta see where you're coming from, but I think there are nuances and it I think it would be useful to see them laid out as you wish, extrapolated, coz I think there are undercurrents I'm missing (but I also have alternative roots in mind, 'twould be interesting to compare and contrast)...so...my lord, quarter to three!

Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.

by rg (leopold dot lepster at google mail dot com) on Thu Sep 20th, 2007 at 09:45:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
How many photo books will remain unread because we have the weekly ET photo round up?

None, at a guess.

Not really comparable though.

We have a fair use rule for how we use quotes here. Why does the same not apply to music?

Why do we never say 'Hey, I read this book - it was interesting - so I scanned it and uploaded it to bit torrent'?

What makes music different?

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Fri Sep 21st, 2007 at 04:10:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Why do we never say 'Hey, I read this book - it was interesting - so I scanned it and uploaded it to bit torrent'?

What makes music different?

Because a music clip lasts 3 minutes but the book takes 3 hours or 3 days or 3 weeks to read.

And because we don't have the tools to copy and splice video and audio files like we do have a keyboard and cut-and-paste. Not everyone has a scanner, and scanning a book is a lot of work anyway. Everyone has a CD player on their computer, and software to rip it and convert it.

If people don't have to scan the book but actually have the audiobook or a PDF e-book they are more likely to just upload it to a bit torrent.

So it is not the same, not by a long shot.

Oye, vatos, dees English sink todos mi ships, chinga sus madres, so escuche: el fleet es ahora refloated, OK? — The War Nerd

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 25th, 2007 at 02:07:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That doesn't apply to 'fair use' of articles that could be copied in their entirety from a web site.

You're also confusing the cost required to copy something with the value of the content, and saying - in  effect - that just because something is hard to copy, it becomes more valuable.

Oddly enough, this is exactly the argument used by the RIAA and others to support DRM.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Sep 25th, 2007 at 06:09:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What I'm saying is it's much easier to do "fair use" with text than with other media. DRM doesn't enable fair use anyway.

Oye, vatos, dees English sink todos mi ships, chinga sus madres, so escuche: el fleet es ahora refloated, OK? — The War Nerd
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Sep 25th, 2007 at 06:18:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, there's plenty of books on P2P. Any of the great SF writers - possibly because that's what the "scanning community" likes to read - but also the major bestsellers. Harry Potter 7 was on Usenet within hours of the US release.

The difference is that unlike music the default format ("hardcopy") requires more work to convert to a "sharable" format.

by Number 6 on Tue Sep 25th, 2007 at 08:31:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
OK, Migeru already said this. Sorry.
by Number 6 on Tue Sep 25th, 2007 at 08:32:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Occasional Series