The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
And yes, if we're honest I think we have to admit that a lot of this knowledge loss was in fact driven by an overenthusiastic embrace of machine technology (plus colonial racism and arrogance, plus the Enclosing logic of industrial capitalism); so if our posterity someday come to blame their hunger or reduced circs on "science and technology" there will be a wee grain of truth in the accusation (which I think is why it irks us technorati so much to contemplate). If we consider what scientists and industrial technologists are party to and responsible for, from Auschwitz to Agent Orange to GMOs to the whole fossil fuel party that may -- let us hope not, but it may -- have doomed our civilisation plus most of the other species we share the planet with... then that disillusioned and angry posterity may just have a point, no matter how fond I am of my laptop... which btw required something like 20x its weight in fossil fuel to construct... sigh...
I'm not so much worried about the high-tech information and knowledge that is perhaps about to be lost -- most of it is frivolous wrt to basic human survival -- you can't eat your iPod. but I'm deeply worried about the more fundamental, essential information and knowledge that has already been -- often deliberately -- wiped out to make way for "newer better more profitable" monocrops (literal and figurative) and fossil fuel dependency. The old joke about cashiers who are unable to do basic subtraction w/o an electronic cash register is not so funny; metaphorically speaking it describes large sectors of our society. I heard a funny story from a Kiwi about military "cooperation" exercises with US troops, in which the US detachment got lost because their GPS failed and they did not know how to read a paper map. Maybe this was a slight exaggeration, but it sounded pretty circumstantial.
In essence what technocratic culture does is to Enclose competence and knowledge in the hands of an elite caste of designers, planners, and engineers, while removing and "obsoleting" more and more skill and knowledge from the work and lives of the masses of their fellow citizens. It's the ultimate in "convenience" -- no need to think or to know anything! To what extent this inculcated cluelessness and uselessness is a contributory cause of depression, anomie, bad social behaviours etc I have no idea; but it does scare me that the majority of people I know are utterly dependent on technology they neither understand nor are able to repair, on food/water systems completely opaque, unaccountable and out of their control, and "magical" supplies of energy which they cannot replicate.
In a sense, technocratic culture makes the majority of the population into cargocultists, having neither competency nor sense of provenance wrt the objects and processes of daily life. (The theory was, at least the ostensible theory was, that this would "free the masses from drudgery" and enable us to develop our minds, pursue the arts and higher education, enjoy leisure and so on. In practise it means that people watch an average of 4 hours of stupidity-inducing corporate TV per diem, much of it dedicated to persuading us to buy even more didactic, dependency-inducing machines.) This essential helplessness and dependency -- on such a fragile system directed by such irresponsible and often malignant powers (such as the neoliberal mafia today, but the industrial boss class has never been folks I'd care to share a bus bench with), scares the heck outta me, and not in some Rugged Individualist way... it scares me for all of us. I don't think any of us can escape the consequences. The ratchet effect has got hold of us, and how are we to get out?
As a counterbalance to the classic C for L I offer McKibben's The Age of Missing Information, a book-length musing on the kinds of information that are being lost every day as we continue on our present course... we are already in a dystopian regime of ignorance and information loss.
What scares the bejeezus out of me is the prospect of a crash that wipes out the machine-tech iron lung on which a majority of the world pop now depends utterly, without sufficient time to recover/relearn the information that was scornfully tossed aside as we embraced our dependency. We have become kinda like a rich man's children who have never had to learn real skills or get a real job; we're fine so long as the trust fund is sound, but if our family lawyer bungles it and loses the lot on a bad investment, we're totally unprepared for the real world. It's a Bubble Economy in more than one sense... there's a boy-in-the-bubble aspect to it as well.
And having said all that, gloomily, I will admit that the enduring popularity of Make Magazine, of internet Kewl Hack sites, the hacker subculture, culture jammers, technology repurposing, not to mention the legions of hobbyists who feel the deep human need to exercise manual skill, dexterity, ingenuity -- all suggest that the instinct for workmanship [Veblen], the thirst for autarky and creativity, and the tinkering gene are not extinct in us -- it's just that most of us are no longer given any useful outlet for them. The ingenuity and solidarity of local communities responding to the Katrina disaster was as inspiring as the official governmental response was appalling. It may be that on the far side of Hubbert's Peak we get a glimpse of what is best in us, not just what we fear. Maybe technocrats will even learn to scale their ingenuity down to the point where it empowers the people at large rather than aggrandising the investor and manager class and rendering everyone else dependent and mystified :-)
I can envision a soft landing without the loss of all our high tech expertise, and with the recovery of at least some (many losses are already irreversible) of the wealth of knowledge that we've been throwing away. But it is only one of a wide range of possibilities, most of which seem more likely and less palatable.
... I wish I had enjoyed the 70's more while they lasted... lately I seriously doubt that I will live to see any better days, more likely worse and worse ones. at least back then one had a sense of hope, there was still enough time to take corrective action. but that hope failed. now, all bets are off and each new survey of our biotic status suggests that the damage is worse and progressing faster than previously estimated; some mornings I can't bear to look at the climate or bio science news.
gotta go fall over... civilisation may be tottering on its undermined foundations, but we still need to sleep... if this post is less than lucid, chalk it up to a long day sorting and packing books. if all goes well, the creek don't rise and the world don't end before then, I leave the US at the end of December. [expect my posting to be very sparse from now on]. The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
I leave the US at the end of December. [expect my posting to be very sparse from now on].
.. I wish I had enjoyed the 70's more while they lasted... lately I seriously doubt that I will live to see any better days, more likely worse and worse ones.
What scares the bejeezus out of me is the prospect of a crash that wipes out the machine-tech iron lung on which a majority of the world pop now depends utterly, without sufficient time to recover/relearn the information that was scornfully tossed aside as we embraced our dependency.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1000#Islamic_world
But check out the world population back then! Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
The best you could hope for is an internal split into towns and villages with live agricultural centres surrounded by dead zones.
Bulldozing houses is much quicker and cheaper than putting them up.
But anyone with a hankering for pastoralism needs to consider that a new dark ages will inevitable create a new war lord class, intent on reducing most of the population to feudal slavery just because they want to, and can.
The most likely outcome is a pre-medieval stockade system, with heavily fortified population centres in the middle of agricultural land, where the peasants are largely considered expendable.
You may be able to tend your homestead in peace in less densely populated areas, but it's not going to be an option within a couple of hundred miles of any reasonably sized city.
umm, haven't we already got them? The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
So far, they've operated in a relatively restrained way in the West itself. What I'm talking about is the everyday experience of state-organised death and violence, which is not something most people are personally familiar with.
Once that phase starts most cities will start to look like Baghdad, only with nowhere to escape to.
Cities are already nasty places, and don't understand the concept of sustainability.
Anyone care to define it?
NB: My own dream has been to haul off to a ruin in the French countryside and build a self-sustainable homestead.
But, but, ahem, what John Michael Greer has to say is sobering.
Equally imaginary is the notion that the best strategy for would-be survivors is to hole up in some isolated rural area with enough firepower to stock a Panzer division, and wait things out. I can think of no better proof that people nowadays pay no attention to history. One of the more common phenomena of collapse is the breakdown of public order in rural areas, and the rise of a brigand culture preying on rural communities and travelers. Isolated survivalist enclaves with stockpiles of food and ammunition would be a tempting prize and could count on being targeted.
So what does work? The key to making sense of constructive action in a situation of impending industrial collapse is to look at the community, rather than the individual or society as a whole, as the basic unit. We know from history that local communities can continue to flourish while empires fall around them. There are, however, three things a community needs to do that, and all three of them are in short supply these days.
The pirate enclaves of the seventeenth-century Carribbean were among the most lawless societies in history, but physicians, navigators, shipwrights, and other skilled craftsmen were safe from the pervasive violence, since it was in everyone's best interests to keep them alive.
The second thing a community needs in the twilight of industrial society is a core of people who know how to do without fossil fuel inputs. An astonishing number of people, especially in the educated middle class, have no practical skills whatsoever when it comes to growing and preparing food, making clothing, and providing other basic necessities.
Well I have a number of practical skills, and I can learn more!, but in isolation they won't do me much good. Greer's analysis is well taken.
Maybe it's too soon to give up on the cities...
The author here does the usual urban snark about how icky, icky, icky it would be to catch a whiff of chicken poo in the corridors... but personally I'll take a whiff of honest chicken manure over a miasma of fine diesel particulate any day... and there is enormous potential to green the roofs and sunny faces of urban buildings.
It may be time to rethink the notion of "city" altogether but that requires a separate post and I have to run... The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
It may be time to rethink the notion of "city" altogether but that requires a separate post
Rethinking the notion of city. I agree entirely. I believe that central to such a process will be the rethinking of the notion of community, in general, and relationships with one's neighbors, in particular; whether it apply to city, town, village, or rural community.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad#A_center_of_learning_.288th_to_9th_c..29
That's about the size of the city where I live. I reckon you can more or less see the city limits from a (not so) tall building or vantage point.
Were DeAnander and DoDo talking about this size of population?
Put another way, maybe you can have all the top class science (well, not all, but a lot) going on in a town of 300-500,000. They would be city states, perhaps, so following the less dystopian line it may be a return to something like Italy after the plague (as you said a while back), only with better connections (no reason for entire networks to collapse I don't think), and 21st Century know-how in agricultural practices, building, materials etc.
Or, to put it another way, England has an area of 130,000 sq km and a population of 61 million--London has a population of 7 million (and the rest!); Bulgaria has an area of 110,00 sq km and a population of 7.3 million; this site gives me 43 cities with populations over 7 million, (468 with populations over a million)...
So...I'm suggesting that what was once a city would today be called a medium-sized town.
Another way of thinking about it ("it" being, how could you survive without a modern civilisation around you) is: how reduced does the world's population have to get before you see the disappearance of centres of learning? They existed in 500BC (world population: 100 million--that's the combined populations of Tokyo, Seoul, Ciudad de Mexico, and New York (more or less.)
So, if we see a collapse of world population...hmmm..
6.6 billion today?
-90% = 660 million?
-99%...
6,600,000,000 / 100 = 66,000,000?
So around 500 AD the world population (300 million) was equivalent to 5% of today's population?
Of course if life dies back to small mammal level, it might be trickier...
But I'm assuming that survivors of any catastrophes will be: (add AND/OR between each item)
Intelligent Farmers Rearers/butchers of livestock Materials specialists Builders Educators Computer types Sailors Mechanics Bakers
etc...
Plenty to build a complex civilisation...in fact, I doubt there has ever been a society that completely lacked an aspect of its existence complicated enough for you to find enjoyable....(he types wildly.) Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
You are suffering a severe case of (what I call) Santa Cruzitis. A wasting disease contracted by prolonged exposure to UC Santa Cruz. Over the past 30 years I've known many sufferers and those many sufferers completely cured once they've relocated away from constant re-infection.
AFAIK, the CDC has not - yet - found the source but I suspect an insidious miasma rising from the various classrooms, lecture halls, & etc. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
As it so happens, my credentialled function at UC Santa Cruz is to be a senior technocrat in Big Science. I am leaving the institution -- among other reasons -- because I've come to the end of my rope w/that culture :-) The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
Let me put it this way: buried within the innards of the main library are reels of film of Upton Sinclair and other luminaries of EPIC giving speeches, interviews, & so on. This archival material is one-of-a-kind. It exists nowhere else. This film is slowly disintegrating. In the not too far distant future this film will no longer be able to be preserved. The librarians would rather see the film disintegrate than allow outsiders to come into their precious stacks (gollum, gollum) and save it.
This kind of insularity causes people at UCSC to reinforce each others neurosis' until they all turn crazy. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
Anyway, gratuitious (and puzzling) discourtesy aside, I'm still not understanding what the point is. Far from reinforcement, I don't know anyone w/in my institution or my social circle here who feels the same sense of personal urgency that I do about demand reduction, relocalisation etc; this is yet another reason why I'm heading out -- to find a (to my way of thinking) more reality-based community. If there is a collective neurosis in effect at my institution, it manifests (e.g.) as a blind faith that fossil fuel will be cheap forever, so we should go on underfunding the local bus system and building more parking structures :-)
The fate of the film archive you mention is very sad indeed, but NIH and turf behaviour are hardly unique to any one campus or org -- seems pretty universal in my experience. I could tell some tales out of school about the inter-institutional politics of my own line of work, but perhaps better not to :-) The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
The choices are now:
If everyone in the subthread agrees, the comments can be hidden by a FPer making them "editorial". Oye, vatos, dees English sink todos mi ships, chinga sus madres, so escuche: el fleet es ahora refloated, OK? — The War Nerd
We usually do better than this here on ET-
That's why I like to come. That's a pointlessly snarky catty shot, and is not usually your style.
I write it off to a bad hairball-- Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.
I think it's fallen prey to most of them.
In essence what technocratic culture does is to Enclose competence and knowledge in the hands of an elite caste of designers, planners, and engineers, while removing and "obsoleting" more and more skill and knowledge from the work and lives of the masses of their fellow citizens.
It goes beyond that. That "elite caste" of technocrats think they are the crown of creation, but they are thenmselves a tool- and the top of the food chain here is the corporate oligarchy- that one quarter of a percent who likely cannot (and need not) ever change a tire. They have a vested interest in keeping the "lower orders" mesmerized by technology and it's toys -ignorant- and therefore dependent and easily manipulated. Us technocrats will then change the tires of the world for them-- and the recipients of the largest capital redistribution in history dispense the illusion of power to the technocrats to just exactly the degree needed, and no more.
Of course, it aint that simple- But that's the next layer, Deanander. Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Oui - May 13 65 comments
by Carrie - Apr 30 7 comments
by Oui - May 303 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2712 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 232 comments
by Oui - May 1365 comments
by Oui - May 910 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 449 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - May 29 comments
by gmoke - May 1
by Oui - Apr 30270 comments
by Carrie - Apr 307 comments
by Oui - Apr 2644 comments
by Oui - Apr 886 comments
by Oui - Mar 19143 comments