The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I have had long discussions about the stability of such system.. and frankly they are metastable... it could stay for long... but inthe end Israel would no longer exist.
This is why keeping the sttlements is one of th emost self-destructive ideas I have seen a country made... well this and elect G.W. Bush.
In any case.. it is up to the isrealis to decide.... Palestinians will just wait.. if the palestinian state is created.. good, if not.. well at some point ask for the right to vote (probably around 2015 given demographic trends)
Oh.. and by the way-.. you rposition is the same that some jewish intelectuals living in Israel...some of them respected but most of them called self-hating jews... a term I used to read and listen a lot.
But make no mistake... Israelis could not care less about palestiinians.. and palesitnians could not care less about israelis...and one of my friends used to tell me.. can you really blame them?
A pleasure I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude
kcurie:
I'm aware there is a huge diversity of views in Israel itself, and amongst Jews world-wide, and even within the Israeli parliament, but somehow the AIPAC/hardline Zionist line always seems to be represented in MSM as THE Israeli view.
If you disagree with that line you are an anti-Semite or a self-hating Jew" one of the most remarkably twists of victim psychology.
Its a pity ET doesn't seem to have more representation from progressive Israelis... "It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Luckily .. the biggest minority has realized that either they give up settlement or the israeli democracy is at stake...
The people in th emiddle have stillnot realized about how dangerous they are... at the moment the majority just does not care... thye do not see t as dangerous.... they see Hamas as dangerous.
Is the territory allocated to the Palestinians enough for a viable country?
The land is semi-aired. Water has always been a high priority item. Would a Palestinian state actually have enough? It is possible, for example, that a first world country would have enough while a third world country would not.
I suspect that part of what has driven Israel to expand its borders at every available opportunity is that what was allocated to Israel in 1948 was not really a viable country. Even Palestine in its entirety has viability problems - especially around water. Expansion into Lebanon to gain control of water resources would definitely make things easier.
aspiring to genteel poverty
Yes, one of consistent tactics of the settlement expansions has been to capture groundwater - although whether that's done on purpose or simply as a side-effect of grabbing the richest land first I don't know.
No, there is not enough water for everyone as it is. The water level in the Dead Sea is dropping fast.
No, there is not going to be more water in the future - if anything, the region is going to become more arid.
Yes, water consumption is greater in industrialised states due to mechanised agricultural irrigation.
Yes, the region is screwed. Badly.
Yup.
Probably solar would work out ok in the region as well.
But it's not going up uniformly. Rather, the increase is limited to the religious part of the population, above all the Ultra-Orthodox, or Haredim - the Ashkenazi Hardim seem to have a fertility rate over 8 (see Appendix 2 for the decline in the Arab birthrate, and Appendix 7 for the figures for the religious Jewish population. I'd appreciate more up to date figures; all I've found is some very partial data in Ha'aretz, which only has data for a few specific cities, with on indication how representative they are.)
I've no idea what the implication of this is as far as relations with the Palestinians are concerned, as I've no idea what the views of the Haredim on such matters are. One should, however, not automatically assume that they are the same as the settlers. It does suggest that in several generations Israel may resemble a theocracy more than a democracy, and should warn against making any easy predictions based on demography.
by gmoke - May 6
by rifek - May 4 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 26 1 comment
by gmoke - Apr 20 1 comment
by rifek - Apr 18
by rifek - Apr 17 2 comments
by Oui - May 81 comment
by rifek - May 43 comments
by Oui - May 42 comments
by Oui - May 4
by Oui - May 1
by Oui - Apr 27
by gmoke - Apr 261 comment
by Oui - Apr 25
by Oui - Apr 23
by Oui - Apr 22
by gmoke - Apr 201 comment
by Oui - Apr 204 comments
by gmoke - Apr 18
by Oui - Apr 181 comment
by rifek - Apr 172 comments