That is,

'our mind' => 'social outcomes'

... in a way that our mind is independent of social outcomes?

That is,

'social outcomes' =/> 'our mind'

As a fundamental premise, this seems to me to be dramatically Newtonian/Cartesian.

More likely:

... => 'our mind' => 'social outcomes' => 'our mind' => 'social outcomes' => ...

... that is, a self-reproducing system, so that fundamentalist, analytical causality is insufficient to map to the problem at issue, and we require a living systems reasoning instead.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.