Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
But aren't there interpretations which don't assume consciousness is necessary?

This seems to be a good thing because otherwise you end up in a solipsistic universe, where you personally are a cause of the Big Bang and all 13 and a bit billion years of everything that happened afterwards. (For varying and approximate values of 'you', at least.)

Assuming consciousness is essential seems to be another spin around the implicit dualism of mind over matter. Although it looks as if it's saying that mind and matter are linked, the implication is really that matter only appears when mind decides it does - which could be a little bit suspect, I think.

How much of a mind do you need before it's conscious enough to start deciding observables?

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Jan 2nd, 2008 at 08:53:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Top Diaries

A New Dawn In America

by Oui - Jan 20
49 comments

The Tory Brexit Pandemic

by Oui - Jan 23
6 comments

The Making of A Rebellion

by Oui - Jan 10
61 comments

China Releases Trump's Deck of Cards

by Oui - Jan 21
10 comments

Italian government collapse

by IdiotSavant - Jan 15
20 comments

Forever Corruption and A Pardon

by Oui - Jan 20
8 comments

Occasional Series