Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Great comment.

Regarding Bohr, isn't that very similar to what Kand said about noumenon and phenomenon? Aren't there serious epistemological issues at the core of all this?

ThatBritGuy:

"It's random within probabilistic constraints" seems to be all that QM can tell you.

There may be a theory which defines the ontology in more detail. But QM doesn't seem to be it.

The only difference between an observer and a non-observer is that the observer is consciously aware of a measured value. But that doesn't define the value.

Which is why I want to make a diary referring to a number of out-there models and experiments from Quantum Mechanics and ask people to hash out the ontology. Because things like "what is an object" are not quite clear. And it is a lot easier to say "the universe is purely relational" than to build any useful model out of that insight, which is why a lot of physicist will talk in those terms around a pool table, but few papers get written.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Jan 3rd, 2008 at 06:21:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Top Diaries

A New Dawn In America

by Oui - Jan 20
49 comments

The Tory Brexit Pandemic

by Oui - Jan 23
6 comments

The Making of A Rebellion

by Oui - Jan 10
61 comments

China Releases Trump's Deck of Cards

by Oui - Jan 21
10 comments

Italian government collapse

by IdiotSavant - Jan 15
20 comments

Forever Corruption and A Pardon

by Oui - Jan 20
8 comments

Occasional Series