Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease | 43 comments (43 topical, editorial, 0 hidden)
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (4.00 / 7)
If this second view is right then regulators have failed. They will have to change the rules to try to eliminate the conflicts that imperil the financial system.

This is, IMO, one of the most dangerous memes and it needs serious debunking.

The implication is that regulators were "asleep at the wheel" and "failed us."

The reality is that regulators were handcuffed by lobbying and pernicious propaganda from free-market ideology economists and politicians, whose stated aim was to eventually end regulation altogether.

So, yes, regulators have been imperfect, but the blame lies with those who sought to undermine regulation in the first place. Some of those people were in fact regulators (e.g. Greenspan) but we should never lose sight of the fact that this is a disaster bred at Cato and the "Adam Smith Institute."

[To tie it to another meme, the anti-regulation people thought only of the efficiency of the market, never the robustness or resilience.]

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 07:15:07 AM EST
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (4.00 / 3)
National regulation is powerless in global markets.

And some global "uber regulator" is no answer, either, because it would never be agreed upon.

Global self regulation by all market participants not just the intermediary lunatics who currently own the market asylum - is the answer IMHO with market standards agreed by governments collectively.

Market 3.0 I called it, almost seven years ago now...

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 07:58:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (none / 1)
National regulation can tax cross-border capital flows. Supranational regulation may have to be agreed along the lines of Keynes' International Clearing Union (updated for the 21st century) if things get much worse. And self-regulations simply doesn't work.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 08:39:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (none / 0)
self-regulations simply doesn't work

Not the way it's been tried.

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 09:06:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (none / 1)
You might as well say that deregulation/unbundling of energy markets hasn't worked the way it's been tried.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 10:50:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (4.00 / 2)
Never mind, "I might as well":  I do!

There has never been such a complete bollocks as the UK electricity market.

But then it is designed to extract the maximum short term profit for shareholders, because their agents are essentially the ones who designed it.

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 11:46:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (4.00 / 2)
And the Californian market (Enron, anyone?).

The point is that deregulation and unbundling is only advocated by those who stand to profit from destroying a working system. It is wasn't for them nobody would have thought of doing it, therefore it doesn't work irrespective of how it's done, because those who might "do it well" won't do it in the first place.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 11:48:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (4.00 / 2)
That is the conventional wisdom, but as REACH showed in manufacturing, it might not be the case.

It is still the case that certain markets in the world are so important (and the US is one of these in various financial transactions) that regulations there actually filter out to the rest of the system.

Yes, there will be loopholes and yes some people will avoid compliance by moving operations to the Cayman islands. In the end however, a first step to stabilising the system is regulating the activities of savings banks, most of whom do sit in a geographical position they cannot escape.

Now I know you have no interest in measures to stabilise a system you believe to be doomed, but that's a separate issue.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 09:42:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (none / 1)
I think you mean decentralised multi-stakeholders regulation rather than self-regulation. In that case, I agree, regulation should take place at the relevant level, which varies with the kind of market. However global markets have to be regulated at a global level.

And to insure fairness and transparency, the rules and methods for decentralised multi-stakeholders regulation must be defined and agreed at a global level.

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet

by Melanchthon on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 03:49:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (4.00 / 2)
Agreed: I did say that Governments would have to set "Market Standards" (at the appropriate level, as you say). ie set the framework within which the "multi-stakeholder" regulation takes place.

There's no difference between "multi-stakeholder" and "self-regulation" by all. It's the same holistic outcome.

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 04:23:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (none / 0)
There's no difference between "multi-stakeholder" and "self-regulation" by all.

Yes, but most people will probably understand "self-regulation" as voluntary regulation by the industry alone (i.e. to leave the financial markets regulation to the banks themselves).

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet

by Melanchthon on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 04:56:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Re: Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease (none / 1)
Regulators failed by allowing the giants of hyperfinance to write the regulations, with the FT's approval.
Daily Kos: The dollar has lost 1/3 of its value
I was a central banker and market supervisor during some of the period of deregulation.  In retrospect it was a mistake to let Citibank and Goldman Sachs define what a good market or a good regulation might be.  But there will be lots of time to learn the lessons of the coming collapse once it is past.
No, there won't be time if the FT propagates the idea that the regulators were to blame. The time to talk about how deregulation was wrong is now.

We have met the enemy, and he is us — Pogo
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jan 26th, 2008 at 05:24:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Tiptoeing around the Anglo Disease | 43 comments (43 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)
Display:

Top Diaries

The importance of being England

by Frank Schnittger - Jan 22
3 comments

The cost of doing business

by Cat - Jan 25
17 comments

The seven deadly sins of the DUP

by Frank Schnittger - Jan 26

British Anglicanism, Disinformation and Harry

by Oui - Jan 9
21 comments

The Protocol and the Founding Principles of the EU

by Frank Schnittger - Jan 13
28 comments

City Agriculture - January 19, 2023

by gmoke - Jan 20

No Peace In Sight

by Oui - Jan 15
90 comments

Mandatory Solar

by gmoke - Jan 7
13 comments

Recent Diaries

We Are All From Mars Now

by Oui - Jan 27
19 comments

The seven deadly sins of the DUP

by Frank Schnittger - Jan 26

The cost of doing business

by Cat - Jan 25
17 comments

The importance of being England

by Frank Schnittger - Jan 22
3 comments

US War Powers, Regime Change and Third Option

by Oui - Jan 21
9 comments

US War Powers, Regime Change -- Part 2

by Oui - Jan 21

US War Powers, Regime Change -- Part 1

by Oui - Jan 20

City Agriculture - January 19, 2023

by gmoke - Jan 20

War In Ukraine A Failed Process by NATO

by Oui - Jan 18
39 comments

No Peace In Sight

by Oui - Jan 15
90 comments

Another Execution

by Oui - Jan 14
4 comments

The Protocol and the Founding Principles of the EU

by Frank Schnittger - Jan 13
28 comments

Judeo-Fascism Arises - Kahane

by Oui - Jan 12
12 comments

Baerbock Solidair with UA in Kharkiv

by Oui - Jan 11
20 comments

Mary Robinson and Fallacy of War and Peace

by Oui - Jan 10
31 comments

British Anglicanism, Disinformation and Harry

by Oui - Jan 9
21 comments

The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea...

by NBBooks - Jan 8
10 comments

Israel Campaign of Illegal Acts w Impunity

by Oui - Jan 7
17 comments

Mandatory Solar

by gmoke - Jan 7
13 comments

No Peace on West's Mind or Vocabulary

by Oui - Jan 6
8 comments

More Diaries...

Occasional Series