The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I agree with him, but my point is that inflating a bigger bubble to avoid the effects of the previous one only pushes the problem a little further down the road (ie now) and makes it even worse wehn it hits (as we now see).
The problem was not the defict of the US - its was its growing deficit over the past few years. A stable deficit over the years is possible, especially when you own the world currency, but a growing one becomes a Pnzi scheme at some point.
In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
I agree with him
So you don't dispute that the Chinese surplus had a recessionary impact on the US. And moreover
The problem was not the defict of the US
What makes no sense is the following: as a result of the .com bubble bursting there was excess capital in non-financial corporations, and underinvestment (claims Wolf)
The savings glut had another dimension, related to a second financial shock - the bursting of the dotcom bubble in 2000. One consequence was the move of the corporate sectors of most high-income countries into financial surplus. In other words, their retained earnings came to exceed their investments. Instead of borrowing from banks and other suppliers of capital, non-financial corporations became providers of finance.
In addition there was a global shortage of capital due to the Chinese ability to absorb huge amounts of investment through its massive and cheap labour force. So we have excess capital in the US and scarce capital abroad even despite the huge Chinese reserves (though we had a debate here where the conclusion seemed to be that reserves are not really a pot of money that can be sent or invested). This again leads to US capital being lent abroad. This is a carry trade: borrow dollars to lend in other countries, and the Fed lowering interest rates just makes matters worse by making it even cheaper to borrow dollars.
So I am beginning to think that the key is the excess capital of non-financial corporations in the US. JK Galbraith would say that high retained earnings and reduced reliance on external borrowing are the signs of a healthy corporation. So, after the .com bubble the non-financial corporations that survived were in good shape (as apparently is notmally the case in the slow years after a crash). What was in bad shape was Wall Street, which couldn't lend to US corporations and so faced reduced turnover and lean times. So it then appears that the Fed's expansionary monetary policy was intended exclusively (since all the other alleged reasons don't hold water) to allow Wall Street to create a bubble to feed off. Also potentially to create a big pile of money to fund the Iraqi adventure. And then the whole China story is just smoke and mirrors to hide the fact that Fed policy was set for the exclusive benefit of Wall Street.
A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
External borrowing to consume in excess of existing rates of income growth is not a sustainable activity. External borrowing to invest in higher sustainable growth rates may be, depending on the terms and the realized benefit of the investment.
Clearly, the US has been borrowing to consume over the past 14 years.
I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by gmoke - Nov 28
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by Oui - Dec 41 comment
by Oui - Dec 2
by Oui - Dec 118 comments
by Oui - Dec 16 comments
by gmoke - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Oui - Nov 2838 comments
by Oui - Nov 2712 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments