The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
What bothers me is that we're still not seeing enough of a pushback on this. So far all we have is a promise to think about minimising bonus culture.
With Rubin whispering in Obama's ear, I'm not convinced we're going to get more than that.
Rubin said, in the recent interview, that he had his own qualms about derivatives, going back to his days as a managing partner at Goldman Sachs. He later wrote in a 2003 book that "derivatives, with leverage limits that vary from little to none at all, should be subject to comprehensive and higher margin requirements," forcing dealers to put up more capital to back the swaps. "But that will almost surely not happen, absent a crisis." Asked why he didn't suggest stricter capital requirements as an alternative in 1998, Rubin said, "There was no political reality of getting it done. We were so caught up with other issues that were so pressing. . . . the Asian financial crisis, the Brazilian financial crisis. We had a lot going on."
Asked why he didn't suggest stricter capital requirements as an alternative in 1998, Rubin said, "There was no political reality of getting it done. We were so caught up with other issues that were so pressing. . . . the Asian financial crisis, the Brazilian financial crisis. We had a lot going on."
So, ya see, if there's no crisis, there's not a hope of getting done what needs to be done; but when there is one, there are so many other things to do, sigh...
This is all part of the knock-on effects of the US and Britain's manipulations in Iran in the "50s. Rescuing and propping up the Shah was a brilliant success right up until it wasn't. The collateral damage from the Iranian Revolution was the humiliation of Carter and the victory of Reagan. I seriously doubt that Reagan could have won in '80 without the Iranian Hostage Crisis. Reagan had been a pitchman since the '50s and given the chance he was perfectly suited to pitch neo-classical economics to the public. Uncle Milty and his acolytes got places of influence again under Reagan. The post-Watergate reforms had not really yet been consolidated and proved easily subverted. One of the lasting contributions of Jimmy Carter, a practicing and believing Christian who strove to embody the moral and ethical values of Jesus in his personal and professional conduct, was to validate the legitimacy of the entry of the fundamentalist charlatans into US politics in a big way. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
There are lots of rapacious, greedy, shortsighted and amoral poor people and not all rich people are nasty.
Also, charities might provide you with some interesting data points about the relative generosity of the very wealthy and the not so wealthy.
It's a cultural and evangelical problem, not an individual one. The poor may or may not be rapacious, but Wall St's culture unarguably has been, to everyone's long term detriment - qv. Anglo Disease, etc.
MP3 will be posted later today. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Aren't too many 'Mericans (and others) with practical business experience outside corporate training: The "is,is" of capital structure and strategy. Ha.
As for "business cycle": May I recommend James Hamilton, "What is real about the business cycle." (St Louie Fed, 2005) I lost the link, sorry, but it's brief and is nicely illustrated with polynomial functions, graphed. His conclusion cracks me up every time.
"If an accurate statistical description of the dynamic behavior of key economic magnitudes is a time-invariant linear model such as equation (4), the the correct answer is,there is no such thing as a business cycle."
That's not the funny part. The funny part, to me, is NBER assignments of "recession" to periods 1857-1912. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
I for one greatly appreciate your contributions, even though I struggle to understand your posts. I suspect that much of what you convey requires the context from which you abstract to be fully comprehendable. I lack the direct experience required.
The rap on me has always been that if you ask me what time it is I will tell you how the watch works prior to telling you the time. This is because part of my education is technical. I don't expect non-technical people to understand much of what I want to convey. I try to resolve this by providing deft, (to me!) sketches of background information as a preface. If one wants to learn something complex, intricate and technical, one should not expect it to be easy. Best if one is not too concerned about appearing ignorant or foolish when asking questions as well. My philosophy is that we are all fools. Part of the human condition. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
The rap on me has always been that if you ask me what time it is I will tell you how the watch works prior to telling you the time.
LOL. I second that. I have half of "formal" education, informed by 20 years hard knocks, and a personal prediliction to be cryptic! Good Lord, my child is exasperated by my long, windy digressions.
Fools though we may be, the willing find the way. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Hamilton blogs on Econbrowser.
Strangely, Gogol was incapable of returning the article reference (yet your title is exact). It found only one ref on the Web, your comment here.
You know Pushkin was a "black" man, right? LOL. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Your GOOG mining reminded me of some reconn I did a few months ago on the topic "participatory realism," i.e. "magical thinking." I used to quote Piaget extensively from books that I own. I found that my comment here ranks in top ten.
Inquiries welcomed. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
Nikolai is a great story-teller.
AHAHAHA. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
MP3 podcast | rush transcript Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
I agree. And after the events of the past eight years, I can't decide whether it's comedy or tragedy that the best hope for real change in my country was denied because the message of change was coopted by people who want anything but.
I'm more than a little irritated about what's gone on here, and I can't help but think that in a few years the gig will be up, and the people like me who called this dog and pony show for what it is will be vindicated.
But we may all be in the soup line by the time that happens.... And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1 19 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 3 4 comments
by Oui - Jul 12 45 comments
by gmoke - Aug 1
by gmoke - Jul 31 3 comments
by Oui - Jul 19 67 comments
by Oui - Aug 9
by Oui - Aug 76 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 34 comments
by Oui - Aug 31 comment
by Oui - Aug 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 119 comments
by gmoke - Jul 313 comments
by Oui - Jul 3016 comments
by Oui - Jul 30
by Oui - Jul 261 comment
by Oui - Jul 253 comments
by Oui - Jul 239 comments
by Oui - Jul 1967 comments
by Oui - Jul 1926 comments
by Oui - Jul 1686 comments
by Oui - Jul 151 comment
by Oui - Jul 137 comments
by Oui - Jul 125 comments
by Oui - Jul 1245 comments