The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Anyway, I do most of my work at the local level. I support these online initiatives, but feel like I can have a greater impact doing what I do now. It's also infinitely more rewarding than the MoveOn genre of politics.
3. This diary was supposed to be about the experience of working on a campaign, NOT about bloggers and youtube and netroots and such. I'm more interested in that, and I thought it would be interesting to the reader here - because I don't even know if you have anything comparable in Europe. "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
Also there is no voter registration, or the ability to be purged from a list and not be allowed to vote. When moving to a new place you have to register at the new community and then, if you are a Swiss citizen, you get automatically the ballots and the other stuff for elections send home. Then either you mail it back or bring it back at the actuall voting weekend, the place is usually at one of the nearest school houses.
Oh they used to do that here. In the 19th Century. LOL. Sorry. Teasing. But "village square"? Anyway, you've all seen Obama and McCain going around giving their stump speeches at what I guess are our versions of village squares: parks, gyms, etc.
Also there is no voter registration, or the ability to be purged from a list and not be allowed to vote. When moving to a new place you have to register at the new community and then, if you are a Swiss citizen, you get automatically the ballots and the other stuff for elections send home.
I don't understand, there is no voter registration, but you register in your community? Register what? Where? This either sounds like the same as voter registration, or very Big Brother.
We also have absentee voting, but I personally don't trust the postal service. Plus, you have no way of knowing if your vote was counted. When you go to the polls, you watch your ballot scanned, and get a receipt. "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
But all of these entities, it is obviously why they need to know your address - so you can get your mail, have electricity, etc. And registering to vote is I guess de facto registering with the government, but it is not required. If you want to work a decent job, you are required to fill out tax forms, so again, the gov't knows where you live. Are they just streamlining things? Can they say "No. You can't live here."? "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
Can they say "No. You can't live here."?
No, not if you are a Swiss citizen or have B permit (sort of a green card).
So your answer really is "Yes." :) "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
I used to see it as big brother too, but after what happened during the last two US elections i do not consider it so bad anymore. I mean the US has become a big brother state without any central citizen registration.
It may vary state by state, but we don't have to declare a party here. In primaries, you have to pick one at some point, but that is for obvious reasons.
The whole voter purging stuff is very very very very rare, and has much more to do with the equipment or corruption. Probably because of 2000, you think that is how it is, but for the VAST MAJORITY of Americans, you register, you get a card and a letter telling you where to vote, and you go vote. Most Americans who have trouble voting are either non-English speaking or new voters unfamiliar with the process. Florida wasn't stolen because of people being unable to vote, but because of stealing an election. I don't see how your system prevents that, given that it is even less transparent than ours.
Really - I think your registering with your government is basically the same thing as registering to vote, the registering is just done differently. "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
I don't see how your system prevents that, given that it is even less transparent than ours.
How is our system less transparent?
Alas, they introduced machine-voting in some constituencies for no good reason, it appears; there have been no reports of consistent vote-flipping in one direction so far. These days it has been tried before the Federal Constitutional Court. The case centres on the lack of transparency, visibility, participation; it is not without merits nor chances.
That's because Illinois has open primaries.
for the VAST MAJORITY of Americans, you register, you get a card and a letter telling you where to vote, and you go vote.
Not including in "the vast majority" are the following states where if you haven't declares a party affiliation you don't get to vote in the primary:
States, commonwealths, districts, and territories that have closed primaries[citation needed]: Arizona California (Republican closed, Democratic semi-closed) Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida [1] Kentucky Maryland Massachusetts (Semi-closed primary) Nebraska New Mexico New York North Carolina (Semi-closed primary) Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island (Semi-closed primary)[2] South Dakota Utah West Virginia
Care to expand on that? A vivid image of what should exist acts as a surrogate for reality. Pursuit of the image then prevents pursuit of the reality -- John K. Galbraith
As for the last part, I say that based on what Fran has told me. Here, there are private citizens present at every step of the election.
Anyway, my aim is not to say one system is better than another, but to let you know how ours works at the micro level, and maybe why we decided to do it like we do. It's a DEEPLY FLAWED system we have, but I think for different reasons you think it is. I think it should be standardized, the same in every state, in every precinct. And I think it's obviously open to corruption. But I also think there are really wonderful aspect of it.
I mean, I did title this diary "Hell is Democracy".
:) "Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.
In Italy (and, I think Switzerland?) the police even visit you apartment, to make sure that it is big enough for the number of people who are supposed to be staying there.
For the local administration the register of residents is mainly important because German communes get money per inhabitant. Thus there was recently a place in North-Rhine-Westphalia where one did not de-register the local dead. ;-) At a time when the crime of procuration had been abolished in Germany I recall seeing a Swiss policeman on TV checking the bedding for proof that it had been warmed by two.
German communes get money per inhabitant.
I'm more interested in that, and I thought it would be interesting to the reader here - because I don't even know if you have anything comparable in Europe.
The UK has canvassing - in fact it's often done by candidates rather than their representatives, because most constituencies are US county sized rather than US state sized.
There's no GOTV effort. There's no tradition of town halls.
Public speeches and rallies have all-but died a death too. Sometimes there's A Speech from A Location, but it's impossible to imagine a potential prime minister being interesting enough to fill a stadium. (Unless perhaps they were fascists and trying to go Nuremberg.)
There's a lot of TV punditry and idle chatter, and TV interviews are the main shop window.
Most party offices have only a handful of people working in them, even at election time. Not that this matters, because although there are nominal candidate selection committees, outsiders are regularly parachuted in from head office.
None of this encourages direct participation. But I realised recently that this was a proverbial feature and not considered a bug. In both of the main parties, opportunities for getting involved have been deliberately narrowed and centralised over the last couple of decades. It's hard not to feel the Lib Dem leadership would like to go the same way.
The only thing resembling populist politics is coming from the far right here.
Plus, he can generally get tens of thousands of people to show up to rallies, so canvassing would be an inefficient use of his time. It might be good for McCain, since no one shows up to his events. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 5 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Oui - Oct 9
by Oui - Oct 91 comment
by Oui - Oct 81 comment
by Oui - Oct 8
by Oui - Oct 74 comments
by Oui - Oct 67 comments
by Oui - Oct 56 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 41 comment
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 25 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments
by Oui - Oct 121 comments
by Oui - Oct 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 30
by Oui - Sep 303 comments
by Oui - Sep 2819 comments
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 276 comments