Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
On top of that, I have been told (by someone who works in the field, but in Australia, so maybe it's due to the peculiarities of a sparse network with few redundancies) that you couldn't run a power network with more than 25% of your sources being either wind or solar.

It may be true locally, with a given power grid that is not expected to get an upgrade. It may also be the unquestioning acceptance of a rule-of-the-thumb number. (And even that number is for an average.)

However, a study for one of the two Danish grid operators found that 50% wind is possible with only minor tinkering. And that's wind alone: if, in theory, you combine similar large capacities of wind and solar, there is actually a 'natural balancing' between the two that reduces the combined intermittance.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Oct 6th, 2008 at 05:26:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Occasional Series