The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The US approach since the 1990s has involved the destruction of domestic industries that provided high wage jobs by buying up companies, shutting down US production, exporting the manufacturing equipment to China and purchasing similar goods from newly minted Chinese manufacturers at a fraction of the cost. The fact that the quality and hence the value of the Chinese goods was often significantly lower was compensated for by their stunningly lower prices, which were affordable by a relatively impoverished population now working at jobs with far lower wages and less benefits. The profits were in the retailers, (where labor costs were traditionally lower,) who distributed the Chinese goods, by those who handled the shipping and distribution of these goods, and by those in the financial sector who set up the arrangements.
Given the cost of labor in China, which is held low by more than one billion rural agricultural population longing for even marginally greater income, the Chinese government took dollars from the US and required workers to be paid in renminbi. The effect was that they accumulated over one trillion of US dollar denominated government paper. They couldn't have paid their workers anything like the value of their labor without setting off even more rampant Chinese inflation. Much of it went into the US real estate bubble via MBSs and CDOs from Fanny and Freddie, etc. In a very real sense, the US exported employment and imported under-employment in the form of Mc-jobs. We also exported the capital surplus so as to get it back in the form of loans to further inflate the real estate bubble. This was the source of the benefits of this cycle which were in the form of fees and profits on the transactions in the financial sector that accompanied the "securitization" of the economy.
Hobson noted that Imperialism was a bad deal for the imperial country as a whole, but that it was highly beneficial to a particular elite. The results of the "globalization" version of financial imperialism have been and are being vastly more damaging not just to the US domestic economy, but to the whole world. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 15 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 10 12 comments
by ARGeezer - Apr 4 29 comments
by Oui - Apr 8 12 comments
by Oui - Apr 4 32 comments
by Oui - Apr 3 35 comments
by gmoke - Mar 30 7 comments
by Oui - Apr 1 26 comments
by Bernard - Apr 19
by Oui - Apr 193 comments
by gmoke - Apr 18
by Oui - Apr 165 comments
by Oui - Apr 1526 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 156 comments
by Oui - Apr 1411 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 1012 comments
by Oui - Apr 1037 comments
by gmoke - Apr 10
by Oui - Apr 812 comments
by Oui - Apr 716 comments
by ARGeezer - Apr 429 comments
by Oui - Apr 432 comments
by Oui - Apr 335 comments
by Oui - Apr 126 comments
by gmoke - Mar 307 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 2916 comments
by Oui - Mar 2764 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 2735 comments