Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
The chances of whoever substituted waste oil for food grade oil being caught may be reasonably high, although proving criminal intent may be a different matter.  The likelihood is that he/she will have few assets and little appreciation of what consequences could have flowed from their actions.  

The problem in today's world is that a relatively petty act can have huge consequences for very many people - and the taxpayer is their only hope for any kind of compensation.  The "markets" cannot solve the problem because even if the offending company is closed down, their is no prospect of their being able to compensate those damaged by the episode.

notes from no w here

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Wed Dec 10th, 2008 at 03:31:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, you can have an implicit intent in criminal negligence, which I think would apply, certainly if this was a business decision. These seem to be all larger businesses, so one of them probably had the fraud motive (I don't think it was a lone worker, but you never know).
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Wed Dec 10th, 2008 at 03:43:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
As far as I am aware, the businesses concerned are quite small.

notes from no w here
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Wed Dec 10th, 2008 at 03:49:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series