The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
A year from now parity will be a distant curiosity.
Economically the pound should have been eliminated back in the late 90s. It was always a footnote on the NuLab ticklist, because pushing harder for it would have been political suicide.
So 'should' and 'will' are completely different questions. The answer to 'should' is Euro entry is the only thing that can save the UK from double digit inflation and interest rates of 15-20% a year or two from now. I'm sure the two year requirement could be waived at short notice, on the grounds that the UK won't get another chance to show practical interest in joining any time soon.
But 'will' is still beyond a last resort, politically. It would take food riots and martial law before it could be considered seriously in Whitehall - or at least a plausible threat of same.
I'd be impressed if Brown suggested joining ahead of time, but I'm not expecting that happen. The Tories would be even less likely to suggest it, for obvious reasons.
My suspicion is that the UK will join the Euro far too late, if at all, and that the Germans will not be over eager to accommodate them - as they are not now over eager to adopt the Brown strategy for European recovery. Bottom line - Germany will call the shots. notes from no w here
The possibility that there might be loss of face, or strings and conditions, not to mention a certain implicit payback, really isn't on the radar here.
The UK could point out that the City has been convenient for various semi-legal and illegal laundering and tax evasion schemes which have had tacit EU support, so it's not as if the EU is an innocent party. But that might be a little too overt and wouldn't be in the spirit of the game as it's played.
This is worrying because UK as Iceland 2.0 is far from unlikely. We do still have manufacturing and engineering industries of a sort, and Brown has been muttering about green this and that. We also have unexpectedly strong media and broadcast industries, and if it were up to me I'd be pushing the creative industries next to sustainable greenery as a replacement for finance - because we have the talent, but most of it is being wasted or sidelined.
Really we're in a 70s-style transition moment now - from Old Economy to New Economy.
Back then Thatcher and the Friedman Freaks were ideally placed to push through their idea of progress. Currently green tech and creative media are an obvious next step, but neither have the lobbying power nor the so-called intellectual and academic support that finance had at the time, so any transition is likely to be much less smooth and much more dangerous.
by gmoke - Nov 30
by gmoke - Nov 24
by gmoke - Nov 7
by gmoke - Nov 11
by Oui - Dec 4
by Oui - Dec 3
by Oui - Dec 312 comments
by Oui - Dec 2
by Oui - Dec 1
by Oui - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 302 comments
by Oui - Nov 30
by Oui - Nov 29
by Oui - Nov 28
by Oui - Nov 288 comments
by Oui - Nov 283 comments
by Oui - Nov 277 comments
by Oui - Nov 274 comments
by Oui - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 262 comments