Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
First of all thanks for your comments and formatting, as usual I was in hurry to finish it and didn't try it with lower resolution.

I'm all in favour of free markets, they are the best way we have to take full advantage of the emergent behaviour bound in human societies. They answer the classic question: "Who decides how much bread is needed to supply a certain city every day?"

Engels and Marx understood that the free market running by default ends up generating social inequity, another consequence of emergent behaviour. They found a different economic boom-and-bust cycle created by the collapse of demand when social inequity reached unbearable levels. To some extent we learnt how to deal with this problem.

But there are other things the free market can't do for you, especially: it can't transform a scarce resource into a plentiful resource. So this is a different problem, it is the managing of the commons. If we need to use a common resource that is vital to our lives, but that is in scarce supply, the free market is not exactly the best option. You could argue that the free market could work in ways to scramble alternative resources, but as I showed before, in the case of energy this is not that simple.

In the end, if we manage the situation to release ourselves from scarce commons, then there should be no obstacle for free markets to work in our favour, provided we don't disregard the findings of the scientific socialists in the XIX century.


by Luis de Sousa (luis[dot]de[dot]sousa[at]protonmail[dot]ch) on Sun Dec 14th, 2008 at 12:08:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:


Top Diaries

Italian government collapse

by IdiotSavant - Jan 15

Dutch Government Collapse

by Oui - Jan 16

A Rush To Judgement Day

by Oui - Jan 17

A Long War?

by Frank Schnittger - Jan 8

Israel and A Presidential Election

by Oui - Jan 14

Occasional Series