Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
It is a question of bringing together investors in the project with investment in the project.

I am proposing a new form of investment, consisting of units redeemable in the production of the turbine as and when built. The proposition is simply to sell for value now Units which are redeemable in (say) Kilo Watt Hours. The proceeds pay for the development and construction of the turbine.

Part (proportional "Equity Shares") of the unsold stream or "Pool" of production would go to continuing "stakeholders", probably a land owner (but this could be the Community); part to an Operator; and the balance should IMHO accrue to the Community.

Once a turbine is built and operating, the risk is lower than when it is yet to be built, and investment in it is attractive to an entirely different constituency of risk averse investors to whom risk friendly development investors may "exit".

The art (your art) is to work out what price these units are "worth" pre-development, and this price reflects the development risk with which you are familiar.

The economic calculation in an economy where energy has been monetised in the way I advocate is entirely different to one in a deficit-based economy. Any energy project which is expected to create or save more energy than has been used in its construction and/or operation will be viable.

I believe that the way in which we can achieve the massive investment we need is initially to re-finance the existing secured debt through "unitisation". This will then "free up" the development capital needed to build new renewables and finance energy savings (the cheapest energy of all).

The key to successful development IMHO is a legal and financial structure whereby the interests of the stakeholders are aligned so everyone has the same interests - including the developer and financier, of course.

This is where partnerships come in, and I believe that such structures minimise development risk. They don't remove it altogether, and I have already come across a couple of transactions which did not stack up using any enterprise model. eg shipping biomass into an urban location for power generation, where the consultant recommended an LLP model over an ESCO but concluded that nothing worked at current prices.

And you still haven't said why credit intermediaries are necessary... :-)

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri Dec 26th, 2008 at 06:20:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
the 'structuring' and 'risk minimization' and manage the 'investment' and 'exit' by investors.

Sure, this can be done by advisors that don't have a balance sheet behind them, but their credibility hinges on attracting players with the money and having a track record of successful structures. Putting up your own money usually helps in that respect; when you start doing this consistently enough, hey, presto, you become a "bank."

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Fri Dec 26th, 2008 at 06:31:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Jerome a Paris:
Putting up your own money usually helps in that respect;

Putting up your own money makes you an investor, alonsgside other investors, and not an intermediary.

That's fine.

It's when you start creating credit on the basis of your capital that the problem starts.

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri Dec 26th, 2008 at 07:45:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Just to be clear, I have no objection to the form of banking/"credit intermediation" that you describe and aim to practise, since I see that as "service provision".

The credit intermediation I see as unsustainable mathematically - and I am not commenting on any moral issues - is the Basel I/II style creation of interest-bearing credit.

I am talking about banking reinventing itself as service provision, and I do not see that as inconsistent with your description of your profession of banking.

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Fri Dec 26th, 2008 at 07:56:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, to the outside observer, you often seem to be in violent agreement.

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Fri Dec 26th, 2008 at 09:03:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series