Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Can we stop calling them pundits?

A good proportion are paid and sponsored propagandists who knowingly and deliberately turn out the Party line.

The rest are arse licker apparatchiks - like the toadies who write for the Economist - who want to feel they're specially privileged and live on the inside.

There is no punditry going on here. The disinformation is almost exactly equivalent to a totalitarian propaganda machine. It's a little bit shinier, a little bit more self-assured and a little bit better dressed than Pravda used to manage, but functionally the output is identical in quality and intended influence.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Mar 10th, 2008 at 08:35:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
TBG, if I could have said it better myself, I hope I woulda. Bang bloody on!
by PIGL (stevec@boreal.gmail@com) on Mon Mar 10th, 2008 at 10:33:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Dead on.
During the Iran-contra debacle I bought a large scanning, trainable satellite dish (this was just before scrambling became common, then universal) with some good ICOM equipment and started finding and watching as many of the raw feeds as I could from all the news agencies and networks. It was truly incredible to watch the first feeds of the day, which then went to the central office in one form, only to hit the distribution feeds in another form- after the first re-write- (sometimes rather mild), and then, as the day wore on, get progressively massaged. To see the "acceptable" spin applied by the prime time news was very revealing.  Like--a different story entirely, often.

Intrusions of the unanointed, unwashed into the real data stream (like mine)was one of the reasons for the huge pressure to encrypt.

So, as you point out, this perverse propaganda process is far from new- in fact, it has long been a basic element in "news" distribution.
But we are far, far better at lying to ourselves than the USSR at it's peak ever was.

We believe our own bullshit. They didn't.

Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Wed Mar 12th, 2008 at 06:35:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Re believing our own bullshit which the Soviets did not: I met some visitors from the Soviet Union in about 1981, around some nuclear disarmament issue. I was 19, they were older, but what I remember is, they made exactly your point in almost exactly your words, in lovely Radio Moscow english.
by PIGL (stevec@boreal.gmail@com) on Tue Mar 25th, 2008 at 12:00:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series