Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Well, not quite -there are democracies where there is no impeachment in the law.
But in the US, impeachment is truly required for the balance of power, since the president can have so much. And that will hurt.

On a side note, France may become interesting in the near future. There is no impeachment procedure, AND parliement is now elected at the same time and for the same length of time as the president. We don't yet have the same organisation to ensure that the rightist party member always sing in tune as with the Republicans, but we're getting closer. And we are starting to get some electronic voting machines in Sarkozy's fief of Hauts de Seine.

I'm not overly optimistic.

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Wed Mar 12th, 2008 at 02:39:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I wouldn't be overly optimistic, either.

No, I didn't mean that no one can have a democracy without an impeachment process--only that the U.S. can't have one if impeachment is going to become unused and archaic (which has been the Republicans' plan ever since they deliberately discredited the mere idea of impeachment as "too divisive" and "bad for the country" by their misuse of it against Clinton).  No other institution in the U.S. is empowered to stand up against the President if Congress won't.  (The Supreme Court can only do it piecemeal, if someone sues, if the case reaches the Supreme Court, and if the Court sides against the President--but it can't remove a President.)  And if Congress won't stand up . . .

by keikekaze on Wed Mar 12th, 2008 at 03:05:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series