The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I think ET lacks a transparent structure and process for defining/agreeing editorial policies, resolving disputes, and representing the public face of ET in the real world.
That's a fair point, I think, with which we have grappled unsuccessfully so far. It's a community blog, so we pride ourselves on not having one person taking all decisions; but within that context it's not arrogant to say, I think, that I have a strong influence on what goes on; and yet I am often in a minority view on a number of topics...
I'm hoping to revisit this in the near future.
hate the moral superiority of pre-defining ourselves as "progressive" when we should have the moral courage to allow the facts and logic takes us where they will - even if that means adopting a position others might type cast as conservative, Marxist, utopian, or whatever.
I sometimes find it very cliquish and prone to setting a higher standard of evidence for dissident views than those which set the "dominant narrative" within ET.
Now this I find really unfair. We may not provide evidence every single time we say something here, but we do have it and, as I noted above, it's sometimes draining to have to re-explain in detail point that we've successfully explained in the past. (Maybe we need to build a quick reference library for some topics...) Evidence there is, and I'll be happy to provide it every single time.
I don't think we set higher standards for any position, quite the opposite. As Colman remarked as well, we're pretty tough on one another - we fight sloppy thinking and unsubstantiated assertions everywhere - and there is more of that amongst those that repeat the 'common wisdom' prevalent in the media than on our side, given how we've taken the pain to go into data in painstaking detail.
because we have a tendency to pay lip service to tolerance of diversity and yet give minority views a hard time. For a forum which prides itself on evidence based argument and high standards of behaviour, too often ad hominum and personalised attacks do creep in.
Now that seriously requires substantiation, because I'd say it's flat out false. ET is one of the websites least prone to ad hominem and insults. By far.
In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by ARGeezer - Oct 24 17 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 23 27 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 22 5 comments
by ATinNM - Oct 19 40 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 19 114 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 11 37 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 8 126 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 6 164 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 2417 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2327 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 225 comments
by ATinNM - Oct 1940 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 19114 comments
by gmoke - Oct 15
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1137 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 8126 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 6164 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 135 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 286 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 2810 comments