Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
The flag thing, as you point out TBG, is crucial. To see a mixed race person ( who is 'read' as African-American) in front of these iconic flags is a 'novelty'. It makes people look at the flags - which they see everyday - in a new way.

Flags, when they represent pride in who you are, are powerful foci for feelings a lot of peope find hard to express. I mean nationality and location are harder to define these globalized days. Your average Finn will only notice the flag on certain flag days (such as midsummer) and on the rare occasions when a Finn or team of Finns win something major that is recognized abroad. For the Finn, the Finnish flag can become a torch of exstacy, say with the winning of the World Hockey Cup. And it is because that flag is not mundane. The flag is seen on these special occasions only. It therefore becomes part of the magic that people feel at that time. It becomes invested with that magic.

But shove a flag in people's faces everyday and it is debased. It becomes wallpaper - UNLESS you see it in a novel context. And that can make the flag come alive again with personal meaning, it brings a flood of associations. Most of them positive. But how to give it personal meaning?

You do what Obama did. You reframe the flag, by associating it with an unusual object - in this case, himself. Not only that, but it plays with figure-ground ambiguity (Is it the flags or Obama that is the main thing in the frame?). The funny thing with that type of oscillation (figure-ground ambiguity), is that it makes the medium 'hot' in the McLuhan sense, where Clinton and McCain are more going for 'cool'.

Granular or low resolution messages are 'hot' because they force you, the observer, to involve yourself - to complete the image from imagination. Without you, the picture is saying, I am incomplete.

High resolution messages keep you at arms length. They are cold. The detail may seem amazing but, essentially, that detail is telling you that you are not needed. You can't get involved. The cold picture says 'I'm good - I don't really need you. I am complete.

Clinton and McCain think that they have to be seen as managers. The kind of people who can take the 3am call about cataclysm as cool as a cucumber. And they can't do the flag thing, because with them it would be mundane and without novelty.

Only Obama could do this so powerfully. And the massage is hope. IMO most people do not know what to hope for, except health, love and happiness. Hope is not greed. Hope is that things will get a little better in the future even if that future will only be enjoyed by their kids.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Wed Mar 19th, 2008 at 06:53:47 PM EST
Flag rows are well visible in US elections. If I had a single look at GOP debates, all I remember flags everywhere.

Obama does look like a legitimate outsider to the Wall-Street - Washington power clans.

Can we compare Gore's and Obama's speech appearances? Did flags help Gore, or they weren't of granular resolution enough?


by das monde on Thu Mar 20th, 2008 at 02:12:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The flags didn't harm Gore, but they were there to remind that he had already been in the WH. There was no novelty in the association.

The interesting question is why Hillary used the big Patton-effect version of the flag. A woman in front of flags is also a novelty - used to jingoistic effect by Thatcher during the Falklands affair. But by that time Thatcher had already demonstrated she had more balls than her compatriots.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Mar 20th, 2008 at 03:40:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I remember a CNN passage in the heated 2000 ridiculing Gore's and Bush's flag wars... That was fair and balanced, presumably.
by das monde on Thu Mar 20th, 2008 at 04:25:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Where these uses of symbols become obvious to the audience, they are less effective. The use of subliminal signals such as book shelves lit in such a way that a joint between a shelf and an upright becomes a crucifix, can be more effective.

What is harder to gauge is the effect of media analysis of such use of symbolism.

One thing that is not discussed much, and which creates some confusion in the European mind, is the reversal in the US of the colours red and blue as indicators for socialism and conservatism.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Mar 20th, 2008 at 05:31:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Seems like a total make-up disaster in the last pic.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Thu Mar 20th, 2008 at 05:34:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That is a compression artefact. You can see the posterization clearly on the podium sign,

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Thu Mar 20th, 2008 at 05:43:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Seems the pic is saturated : look at the "We the people" panel underneath.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Thu Mar 20th, 2008 at 05:44:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Top Diaries

DUP decline continues

by Frank Schnittger - Aug 29

Islamic State Khorasan Province

by Oui - Aug 24

The American Dream

by Oui - Aug 22

Occasional Series