Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
I heard of someone who goes to book signings and keeps the books on the off chance that the author becomes big in a few years' time. Imagine a signed copy of Harry Potter's first edition!

It'd be nice if the battle were only against the right wingers, not half of the left on top of that — François in Paris
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 25th, 2008 at 08:43:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Harry Potter First Editions - Harry Potter at Catch The Snitch
An unsigned first edition copy of "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's (Sorcerer's) Stone" may be worth between £3,000 and £4,000. A signed copy may be as much as £10,000. One of the first edition "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's (Sorcerer's) Stone" hardbacks was sold for £10,575 at a Sotheby's auction in early 2002


Any idiot can face a crisis - it's day to day living that wears you out.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Tue Mar 25th, 2008 at 08:51:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
One of the toughest jobs I ever had was leading a team to design and build a website to market and sell rare Scotch whiskys.   Not being a Whisky drinker I had to do a tasting course and also visit various distlleries around Scotland talking to the Distillery Managers etc.

On the blind tasting course - attended by quite a few master distillers, very few had any consistent ability to tell the main brands apart - whether it be a £200 rare malt or a £30 standard bottle - and some even had difficulty recognising that one of the drinks thrown into the blind tasting was a brandy.

Yes we could tell the major differences apart - the cask strength, degree of peatyness etc. but very very few can really appreciate the the minute differences which can lead to huge variations in price.  Its not about the liquid itself, its about how people want to badge themselves - as connoisseurs  and as different from the hoi polloi.

I'm sure I've upset a few people here!

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Tue Mar 25th, 2008 at 12:04:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Beware a nocturnal visit from the Shìth of the Caol Ila cult ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Mar 25th, 2008 at 12:15:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Caol Ila?  It's only a pale shadow of Lagavulin in any case.....

"It's a mystery to me - the game commences, For the usual fee - plus expenses, Confidential information - it's in my diary..."
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Tue Mar 25th, 2008 at 12:24:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh yes, the price expensive whiskys are to (at least) 99% status consumption. An obvious indicator is that single malt are valued higher then blended. Blended is more work and - skilled work at that - producing a richer variety of flavours. But single malt is better for scarcity in that you have a particular malt and a particular age. Not as good as wines from a particular grape, particular place and particular year but better then nothing.

IIRC, whisky was made an object of high status pretty late - 1900ish or so. Before that it was simply the booze made and drunk in particular regions.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Tue Mar 25th, 2008 at 06:35:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I always thought that whisky had become popular in England when Napoleon blockaded the UK and cut off the Cognac supply, which was before that the source of booze for the English gentry...

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Wed Mar 26th, 2008 at 09:56:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series