The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The U.S. is obviously playing the part of 1900-era Imperial Britain, but the growing power is China (playing the part of 1900-era America) and the resource holders are the Middle Eastern Arabian and Persian states. I would propose that as it develops, China's huge demand for external resources and her perhaps even less fluent approach to foreign policy will result in a war between the Arabs and China, or possibly between Europe and China over control of Arabia.
The current action in the Middle East is a sideshow compared to what will happen when a country openly tries to take the oil by force.
When considering the U.S., it is easy to forget that the New World still has a low enough population density and enough unexploited resources that both Noth and South America can run good economies in isolation. It's the Far East and Europe that have the problem of resource constraints.
When considering the U.S., it is easy to forget that the New World still has a low enough population density and enough unexploited resources that both Noth and South America can run good economies in isolation.
No, the Americas on their own are not enough ... Southern to Central Africa is also required to have a full complement of strategic resources. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by gmoke - Nov 28
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by Oui - Nov 2832 comments
by Oui - Nov 278 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments
by Oui - Nov 10
by Oui - Nov 928 comments
by Oui - Nov 8
by Oui - Nov 73 comments
by Oui - Nov 633 comments
by Oui - Nov 522 comments