The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Also note that there is a high correlation between economic freedoms and over freedom including political freedom. You somehow confuse anarchy with economic freedom.
I'll freely admit that death squads pro capita is a rather blunt metric for political freedom, but if you can't speak your mind without getting gunned down by goons then you can't very well have a free and open society, can you?
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
If you want to use that gage as the amount of freedom, then so be it. But most use a wide variety of measurements to get the number.
And if you can't check out any book that you want at the library? Or even start your own book club for local residents-what does that mean?
I once met a group that traveled around Cuba for a while, and yes it was very enlightening for myself. But once they questions from the audience, I asked them if they had visited any libraries even if at universities. Well no they had not. They felt that was a trivial thing to explore and was not where true freedoms are measured.
From my experiences, I saw that any philosopher I wanted to read about was there. Orwell, to Marx to Hitler...
Maybe you know of other information but those areas not controlled by AQ or any other extremist groups then CDs, DVDs and yes books freely flow and are exchanged.
First, it should be noted that there is no Al Qaeda presence in Vietraq. There are various domestic partisan groups that like to style themselves "Al Qaeda in Iraq" but there is not a shred of indication that they have anything to do with what is usually understood as "Al Qaeda."
That being said, "in areas not controlled by partisans" is a pretty big qualifier. The Americans can barely keep the various Green Zones secure. And when it comes to that, I am pretty sure that you can't just walk into a bookstore in the Green Zone and pick up a book by Sayyid Qutb or Mahmoud Ahmedinejad... One person's anti-government propaganda is another person's terrorist tract and all that.
Notice I did not say partisans in that quote, it was extremists. How would you characterize Kurdistan? But maybe you have some information about what is accepted or not accepted in various parts of the country, no?
And of course you said "extremists." But you were talking about partisan organisations. And while I have not studied the matter extensively, I think it is fair to assume that it will be hard to find the complete works of Kemal Atatürk in the Kurdish territories. So no, I don't buy the assertion that you can pick up any book you like in Vietraq. Not even if you exclude the parts of Vietraq where people are shooting at each other on a regular basis. Which in any case makes any comparison apples-to-oranges...
I can't imagine that we really want to see what their markets have and judge it by that, but if you want to pursue looking at any laws that prevents such books as you mentioned from being distributed, let me know.
They may or may not have contacts with each other and may or may not be on friendly terms, but it is patent nonsense to claim that they are "the same group of extremists" when their organisational structure, political goals, strategies, tactics and membership are unrelated, evolved separately and will likely continue to evolve separately. Simply saying "here be commies" is not an argument.
I would also ask that you pay attention. Notice I did not say the Marxists in Vietnam and Cambodia were the same, I said China and Vietnam had the same goals and desires.
Now of course you could be right that they separate their ways, we have seen a lot of groups separate and go their ways. And from I read their was already some falling out during the control of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
Again, I am saying if they recognize each other and abide by the same philosophies and ideologies even to supporting each other in resources then they are the same.
And none of your examples do. FFS, half of the partisans in Vietraq that are being labeled "Al Qaeda" are Shia Muslims. Calling them Al Qaeda is like accusing an Ted Haggard of being a member of the Opus Dei.
And besides, the Marxists in Cambodia (or Viet Nam, if you prefer) manifestly didn't have the same goals and desires as Marxists in China. Both wanted to kick the US out of Indochina and both groups were (more or less) Marxist, but if that's criteria for likeness, then the Pope and the American fundagelicals are the same brand of extremists - both are Christian of some description and both want to kick gays out of America.
Finally, you are begging the question when you argue that there has been "a falling out" - if there was no collusion in the first place, then a falling out is not really the proper description.
So can we please end this detour?
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 26 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 25
by gmoke - Nov 19 6 comments
by Oui - Nov 20 16 comments
by Oui - Dec 45 comments
by Oui - Dec 31 comment
by Oui - Nov 305 comments
by gmoke - Nov 30
by Oui - Nov 26
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 264 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 25
by Oui - Nov 2016 comments
by Oui - Nov 193 comments
by Oui - Nov 1911 comments
by gmoke - Nov 196 comments
by Oui - Nov 1711 comments
by Oui - Nov 1431 comments
by Oui - Nov 1316 comments
by Oui - Nov 107 comments
by Oui - Nov 830 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 781 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 711 comments
by Oui - Nov 697 comments
by Cat - Oct 3180 comments