The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
And the incomes that go into the poverty calculation, are they before or after tax? Are all taxes taken into account if the latter? Are employer-paid benefits (health care, etc.) included? If so, are the equivalent publicly funded parts of the Nordic social infrastructure given similar treatment?
In general, I suspect that the pre-redistribution figures say very little about economies like the Nordic ones and are insanely sensitive to the operative definition of "redistribution." It is in many cases very nearly impossible to tell where the government ends and the rest of society begins, making the distinction between income distribution and income redistribution rather unclear.
For instance, the partly labour-union-managed unemployment insurances handle something on the order of 5 % of GDP - better than 80 % of which comes directly from general revenue, making them one of the largest single items on the finance bills. Are they public or private? Are they "redistribution" or "insurance?" I don't know. Does it matter? Not a whit.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
I somehow deleted "UK" from that sentence. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
For people with an income close to, but below the health insurance cap, the current marginal tax and social insurance rate in Germany is more than 73%, and before Schroeder's income tax cuts, you could have more than 80% marginal rate (in a narrow but densely populated income band). Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den MenschenVolker Pispers
As said above, the cap is not simply a cap. You can leave the public health insurance if you earn that much, which is way cheaper. So a single with gross income of 43201 EUR, can end up with 200 EUR more each month than a person with an income of 43199 EUR. Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den MenschenVolker Pispers
If so, I ask you to define me the inputs I should look up in the form of a formula.
Now I can say the following [pdf!]:
I note however that Slovenia is a less obvious argument as I originally thought: the present income tax reflects tax cuts by current right-wing government, and even if those were less 'ambitious' than original proposals, the biggest gift to the rich was the elimination of a top income tax rate of 50%. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 18
by Oui - Jan 21
by gmoke - Jan 18
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 15 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 8 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 31 8 comments
by gmoke - Dec 29
by Oui - Jan 22
by Oui - Jan 221 comment
by Oui - Jan 20
by Oui - Jan 1921 comments
by Oui - Jan 18
by Oui - Jan 17
by Oui - Jan 175 comments
by Oui - Jan 166 comments
by Oui - Jan 1513 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 152 comments
by Oui - Jan 149 comments
by Oui - Jan 142 comments
by Oui - Jan 133 comments
by Oui - Jan 131 comment
by Oui - Jan 126 comments
by Oui - Jan 103 comments
by Oui - Jan 92 comments