The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The ability to set the foundation interest rate is unaffected.
There are essentially two tools Central Banks can use: interest rates, and reserve requirements.
The Fed, BoE etc now find that interest rates have become entirely irrelevant, and this tool has therefore been lost.
Unlike the Chinese, the Fed, BoE etc choose not to use reserve requirements as a policy instrument, and that tool was therefore given up. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
Of course, if interest rates have become irrelevant, then so have reserve requirements, so that would be a two-fer. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
In what sense has interest rates become irrelevant?
The rates at which Banks are lending are increasingly parting company from the Central Bank rates. That's because the premium they charge for their implicit guarantee has gone up with the perceived likelihood of default.
Why do you say that if interest rates are irrelevant so are reserve requirements? "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
In what sense has interest rates become irrelevant? The rates at which Banks are lending are increasingly parting company from the Central Bank rates. That's because the premium they charge for their implicit guarantee has gone up with the perceived likelihood of default.
Yes, the mark-up over the cash rate has gone up.
How does that make the cash rate irrelevant? The mark-ups of bank lending over banks cost of funds have not been locked in place since direct regulation of bank lending rates was dropped.
Why do you say that if interest rates are irrelevant so are reserve requirements?
What do reserve requirements do? They establish the underlying leverage of central bank operations to inject and withdraw reserves, to manipulate the cash rate.
What else could they be doing? They are not contingency reserves for capital adequacy, because they are not free to be used to meet capital losses. They are not a tool to manipulate the quantity of money in the system, because the central bank cannot manipulate the quantity of credit-money in the system and already has the power to manipulate the quantity of fiat currency in the system. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
How does that make the cash rate irrelevant?
If falls in the cash rate have no effect whatever on the rate Joe Public pays on his mortgage or any other loans he takes out, I would say that makes the cash rate "irrelevant", but I guess that's just my opinion. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
This is reminiscent of the way Peak Oil means that OPEC can no longer lower prices by raising production, but they can still raise prices by withdrawing production.
Peak Credit? When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
On that logic, you are effectively dividing into two possible alternatives:
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 23 7 comments
by Oui - Feb 22 8 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 20 2 comments
by gmoke - Feb 14 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 19 13 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 15 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 14 13 comments
by Oui - Feb 17 33 comments
by Oui - Feb 25
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 237 comments
by Oui - Feb 228 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 202 comments
by Oui - Feb 2018 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1913 comments
by Oui - Feb 195 comments
by Oui - Feb 18
by Oui - Feb 1733 comments
by Oui - Feb 168 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1523 comments
by gmoke - Feb 142 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1413 comments
by Oui - Feb 144 comments
by Oui - Feb 1238 comments
by Oui - Feb 774 comments
by Oui - Feb 665 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 518 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 412 comments
by Oui - Feb 136 comments