Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Migeru:
If what Bush has done is not impeachable, what will be in the future?

Just wait and see what the lunatic right tries to slap on Obama.

ARGeezer:

I can see a certain wisdom in declining to start a tradition of prosecuting ex-presidents.

The only thing which is protected by avoiding impeachment is America's self-serving view of itself as a meritocratic democracy. If a president is prosecuted and jailed, that mythology is torn to ribbons.

It would be traumatic in the short-term, but maturing and healthy in the longer term. The core US mythology seems to be that if you game the system with enough cunning, the law won't apply to you and you can retire rich.

A jail term would snap many people out of that fantasy, with a priceless 'Oh, shit...' moment.

It would be like the death of JFK in reverse - instead of proving that the system can be gamed, it would reinforce the fact that yes, the rules really do apply to you too.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Jun 16th, 2008 at 02:06:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Impeachment has nothing to do with jail. It simply removes someone from their office. Asking for impeachment given the current numbers in the Senate is like asking a minority party in a parliamentary system to use a vote of no-confidence to oust a government, with the difference that it takes a lot more time and effort. I doubt we could get to fifty, let alone the sixty-seven votes needed (At best one Repub vote for (Hagel) and almost certainly a number of conservative Dems against, plus Lieberman.
by MarekNYC on Mon Jun 16th, 2008 at 02:18:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No-confidence votes that were certain to be lost have been used to important political effect in several countries. The case I'm most familiar with is Felipe Gonz´lez in Spain in 1980, which helped convince voters that he represented a serious government alternative. In 1982 he went to win the biggest landslide we've ever had.

Bush's impeachment wouldn't be done to necessarily successfully convict (there might not be time enough before the next president's inauguration) but to get all the dirty laundry out in plain view.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Jun 16th, 2008 at 02:28:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series